|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Sep 14, 2008 21:28
On Sep 14, 7:01 pm, "bigflet...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
wrote:> I remember many years ago, my older brother and his mate were walking
> home after a 'couple of beers' . Just mildly relaxed. Far from
> intoxicated and neither touched drugs.
>
> They both saw a couple of UFO's. Their nature was such, that one
> wouldnt have mentioned it to the other for the fear of being
> ridiculed.
>
> They mentioned it to me, because they knew I was open minded and had a
> mild curiosity of the subject.
>
> I had just read what at the time, seemed quite feasable, regarding an
> individualls ability to see (and hear) beyond the normal spectrum.
>
> I was amazed how even the mention of such an explanation put me, in
> their eyes, where they felt they would be put, if mentioned to ther
> work mates.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.10Kb) |
|
| | 5 Comments |
|
|
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Sep 15, 2008 08:15
On Sep 15, 2:28Â pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:> On Sep 14, 7:01 pm, "bigflet...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> I remember many years ago, my older brother and his mate were walking
>> home after a 'couple of beers' . Just mildly relaxed. Far from
>> intoxicated and neither touched drugs.
>
>> They both saw a couple of UFO's. Their nature was such, that one
>> wouldnt have mentioned it to the other for the fear of being
>> ridiculed.
>
>> They mentioned it to me, because they knew I was open minded and had a
>> mild curiosity of the subject.
>
>> I had just read what at the time, seemed quite feasable, regarding an ...
|
| Show full article (1.38Kb) |
|
| | 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: Leon HoeneveldLeon Hoeneveld Date: Sep 15, 2008 08:32
bigfletch8@ gmail.com schreef:
I ask myself:
To whom do you need to prove something?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Sep 16, 2008 19:46
On Sep 16, 1:32Â am, Leon Hoeneveld
wrote:
> bigflet...@ gmail.com schreef:
>
> I ask myself:
> To whom do you need to prove something?
Which is why we each ask "self". To 'do better' we each need to 'know
better'.
Its natural.
Of course, it is absolutely and totally impossible to prove to to
others. It just appears that way, until we are at least receptive to
the possibility of 'self', then we realize where all the frustration
came from (clue...it was never from others:-), and hence, the
solution.
BOfL
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: Leon HoeneveldLeon Hoeneveld Date: Sep 17, 2008 09:40
> Of course, it is absolutely and totally impossible to prove to to
> others. It just appears that way, until we are at least receptive to
> the possibility of 'self', then we realize where all the frustration
> came from (clue...it was never from others:-), and hence, the
> solution.
>
>
The best thing to be achieved is that another takes the point that a
reasonable doubt should apply for any conviction.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Sep 17, 2008 17:40
On Sep 18, 2:40Â am, Leon Hoeneveld
wrote:
>> Of course, it is absolutely and totally impossible to prove to to
>> others. It just appears that way, until we are at least receptive to
>> the possibility of 'self', then we realize where all the frustration
>> came from (clue...it was never from others:-), and hence, the
>> solution.
>
> The best thing to be achieved is that another takes the point that a
> reasonable doubt should apply for any conviction.
Scepticism is a barrier between knowing and believeing. Very healthy
as long as it doesnt dominate.
BOfL
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
