There are other factors besides land.

Georgists are very good on the issue of land but ask one to explain
the high tax Clinton economic boom and he'll be stumped.

Generally, no good economist will every be comprehensive, even if you
omit the outright frauds at Hoover, Heritage, Am. Enterprise, the
Chicago School, etc.

Bret Cahill

"Bret Cahill" aol.com> wrote

Oh come now. How could the claim made by a Hoover Institution Economist -
that the world has practically infinite resoureces - be fraud?

Oil does grow in the ground by an act of Gawd doesn't it? So we have a
practically infinite source.

Right?

Bret Cahill wrote:

Henry George saw part of the problem. Too bad he didn't see the rest of
the problem or at least have the political savvy to make common cause with
the Greenbackers who did.

Mark M.

Activists have been quite successful with George's land arguments
getting local governments in Pennsylvania on LVT.

Rightards will try their obfuscation calling it "confiscation" but all
they are really doing is the rather mundane seeming task of changing
millages.

PA has some beautiful countryside, no shacks or trailers. Their may
be a reason for this.

No doubt others will add more contributions.

Bret Cahill wrote: