Re: Have you seen an Atheist who doesn't believe in Global Warming?
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Have you seen an Atheist who doesn't believe in Global Warming?         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: James Beck
Date: Sep 12, 2008 13:43

In article <6vCdnVTyPqf4T1fVnZ2dnUVZ_o7inZ2d@posted.echolabs>,
furgfurgfurg@yahoo.com says...
> James Beck wrote:
>> In article
>> ,
>> furgfurgfurg@yahoo.com says...
>>> James Beck wrote:
>>>> In article
>>>> ,
>>>> furgfurgfurg@yahoo.com says...
>>>>> James Beck wrote:
>>>>>> In article <3833f931-3602-4151-97a8-65b54143eac1@
>>>>>> 8g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, meatnub@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 11:43 am, ComandanteBanana
>>>>>>> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> This is what my logic tells me: Atheists believe in
>>>>>>>> SCIENCE AND EVOLUTION, which is why they are
>>>>>>>> Atheists. And so science is also telling us of a
>>>>>>>> clear and unequivocal connection between HUMAN
>>>>>>>> POLLUTION and GLOBAL WARMING.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is then the case that those who do NOT believe in
>>>>>>>> Global Warming (yeah, there are many out there) are
>>>>>>>> the same sheep who happen to believe in God. Of
>>>>>>>> course, this belief comes quite handy for their
>>>>>>>> polluting SUVs. Why have any moral qualms about it
>>>>>>>> if there's no Global Warming?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, this is, like science, only a THEORY, so it
>>>>>>>> remains true until we find many Atheists who do not
>>>>>>>> believe in Global Warming. If they do is because
>>>>>>>> they are trying to blend in with the sheep. ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE
>>>>>>>> (beware of the
>>>>>>>> Christians!)http://webspawner.com/users/donquijote
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The world had the most carbon in the air millions of
>>>>>>> years ago when life evolved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so maybe by polluting we'll actually create new life
>>>>>>> forms, or evolve ourselves.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The simple facts are :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It has been warming up ever since the last ice age.
>>>>>
>>>>> Really? Wasn't there a "little ice age" in the 17th
>>>>> century?
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, but that was "The Little Ice Age", not the last
>>>> ice age. Kind of answered yourself there, didn't ya'?
>>>
>>> If there was little ice age since the last ice age then
>>> temperatures haven't been warming up ever since the last
>>> ice age.
>>
>> The trend has been upwards since the ice age, if you
>> can't wrap your head around that and want to dwell on the
>> little ice age, I suggest we offset that little burp with
>> the Medieval Warm Period.
>
> I guess it depends on how long a time period you use to establish a trend.

Ummm, the period of time since THE LAST ICE AGE.
I thought I was pretty clear on that.
Anyway, I'm done with this, good day.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: Global Warming Skeptics = LOSERS. LIARSalt.2600 ·
Re: "Nuclear energy 'not the solution to global warming"sci.energy ·
Re: Global warming testsci.military.naval ·
Re: A novel explanation for putative global warming (measuring error, Central Limit Theorem)alt.global-warming ·
Re: global warmingsoc.religion.christian ·