Re: Have you seen an Atheist who doesn't believe in Global Warming?
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Have you seen an Atheist who doesn't believe in Global Warming?         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Jack
Date: Sep 12, 2008 13:34

James Beck wrote:
> In article
> ,
> furgfurgfurg@yahoo.com says...
>> James Beck wrote:
>>> In article
>>> ,
>>> furgfurgfurg@yahoo.com says...
>>>> James Beck wrote:
>>>>> In article <3833f931-3602-4151-97a8-65b54143eac1@
>>>>> 8g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, meatnub@gmail.com says...
>>>>>> On Sep 11, 11:43 am, ComandanteBanana
>>>>>> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> This is what my logic tells me: Atheists believe in
>>>>>>> SCIENCE AND EVOLUTION, which is why they are
>>>>>>> Atheists. And so science is also telling us of a
>>>>>>> clear and unequivocal connection between HUMAN
>>>>>>> POLLUTION and GLOBAL WARMING.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is then the case that those who do NOT believe in
>>>>>>> Global Warming (yeah, there are many out there) are
>>>>>>> the same sheep who happen to believe in God. Of
>>>>>>> course, this belief comes quite handy for their
>>>>>>> polluting SUVs. Why have any moral qualms about it
>>>>>>> if there's no Global Warming?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, this is, like science, only a THEORY, so it
>>>>>>> remains true until we find many Atheists who do not
>>>>>>> believe in Global Warming. If they do is because
>>>>>>> they are trying to blend in with the sheep. ;)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE
>>>>>>> (beware of the
>>>>>>> Christians!)http://webspawner.com/users/donquijote
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The world had the most carbon in the air millions of
>>>>>> years ago when life evolved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so maybe by polluting we'll actually create new life
>>>>>> forms, or evolve ourselves.
>>>>>>
>>>>> The simple facts are :
>>>>>
>>>>> It has been warming up ever since the last ice age.
>>>>
>>>> Really? Wasn't there a "little ice age" in the 17th
>>>> century?
>>>
>>> Yeah, but that was "The Little Ice Age", not the last
>>> ice age. Kind of answered yourself there, didn't ya'?
>>
>> If there was little ice age since the last ice age then
>> temperatures haven't been warming up ever since the last
>> ice age.
>
> The trend has been upwards since the ice age, if you
> can't wrap your head around that and want to dwell on the
> little ice age, I suggest we offset that little burp with
> the Medieval Warm Period.

I guess it depends on how long a time period you use to establish a trend.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: Global Warming Skeptics = LOSERS. LIARSalt.2600 ·
Re: "Nuclear energy 'not the solution to global warming"sci.energy ·
Re: Global warming testsci.military.naval ·
Re: A novel explanation for putative global warming (measuring error, Central Limit Theorem)alt.global-warming ·
Re: global warmingsoc.religion.christian ·