ComandanteBanana wrote:
> On Sep 11, 4:42 pm, Shrikeb...@
gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sep 11, 8:43 am, ComandanteBanana
>> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This is what my logic tells me: Atheists believe in
>>> SCIENCE AND EVOLUTION, which is why they are Atheists.
>>
>> Some, on the other hand, believe in envirofundamentalism.
>
> What's that, I don't think we should run the world based
> on ignorance. However I believe it should the PRIORITY #1
> of the world. Not the world against terror, exploring
> Mars, etc.
>
>>
>>> And so science is also
>>> telling us of a clear and unequivocal connection
>>> between HUMAN POLLUTION and GLOBAL WARMING.
>>
>> Actually, only software climate models are telling
>> us much of anything. Either that or post hoc,
>> ergo propter hoc. Take your pick. But as Richard
>> Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric
>> Science at MIT puts it: software climate models
>> are like Ouija boards.
>
> Something like 90%% of scientists agree with the
> connection. The remaining 10%% must be part of the
> Republican Party. (I don't have the exact numbers).
Polls? Who cares? How about get down to basic
--numbers for concentrations
of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere at various locations worldwide going
back, say, 150 years or so.