On Sep 11, 8:43Â am, ComandanteBanana
yahoo.com>
wrote:> This is what my logic tells me: Atheists believe in SCIENCE AND
> EVOLUTION, which is why they are Atheists.
Some, on the other hand, believe in envirofundamentalism.
> And so science is also
> telling us of a clear and unequivocal connection between HUMAN
> POLLUTION and GLOBAL WARMING.
Actually, only software climate models are telling
us much of anything. Either that or post hoc,
ergo propter hoc. Take your pick. But as Richard
Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric
Science at MIT puts it: software climate models
are like Ouija boards.
> It is then the case that those who do NOT believe in Global Warming
> (yeah, there are many out there) are the same sheep who happen to
> believe in God.
Did you determine this scientifically? Or is it just some
foregone conclusion that you hold on faith?
> Of course, this belief comes quite handy for their
> polluting SUVs. Why have any moral qualms
Moral qualms? Kind of a religious concept, don't you
think? I'm reporting you to atheist central, as a
probable religious worm.
> about it if there's no
> Global Warming?
Well, empirically, there has been global warming. The
cause is not so easy to be so certain about.
> Well, this is, like science, only a THEORY,
It isn't even a theory. I suppose you could say it's
a hypothesis. In the same sense that any other
conjecture you pull out of your ass is a conjecture.
> so it remains true until
Interesting understanding of the philosophy of science
you have here.
> we find many Atheists who do not believe in Global Warming.
Actually, it seems that envirofundamentalists have
just replaced one for of apocalyptic faith for another
one. It's always the end of the world, and the sinners
(in their SUVs) are to blame. What would Jesus
drive? A Panzer V.
> If they do
> is because they are trying to blend in with the sheep. ;)
Not a single True Scotsman.
