antimatter exists in the laboratory,
it is said in _The Big Bang Never Happened_ by Eric Lerner.
Venus could be a Muslim Paradise beneath that veil
of gas, unless it is really high-pressure CO2
per the alleged reconnaisance by US and SU probes;
so?
someone, ask Farakhan ?!?
> Now, would any of you supposedly intelligent folks care to apply your
> deductive formulated logic on behalf of other intelligent life
> existing/coexisting on Venus?
thus:
this is where the orthodoxy worketh not;
there are no antiwaves, only waves,
whether within matter or antimatter (or
within the plenum of Pascal's vacuum,
in either region .-)
did you mean,
twice the speed of light anhialation
of an outgoing & incoming wave, or
gamma 'rays' produced by matter-antimatter anhialation?
> Positive gammas and negative or antigammas should be the 2x'c'
> collider norm.
thus:
yes, a useful fiction per convergence of a geometrical series, or
an arithmetical one. the whole field (sik) is subsumed
by the study of p-adics,
wherein "minus one" (or -1.0000... or -...00001.) is found
to be ...9999., per Hensel's lemma. (in short,
the integers have the same properties of 'decimal' periodicities,
as do the fractions, or the nth roots)....
what ever happenned to Buridan's donkey,
I don't see that this really effects EPR,
one way or the other; like Schroedinger's summarily dystressed cat,
the interpretation is all Copenhagenskoolish!
> Does "it" already relate to set theory?
thus:
oh; thought it was a product of noncommutative tautological
phasespaces.
> the cited site to usenet. He lowered superscripts and raised subscripts.
thus:
the Peanut Gallery would stil favor a demonstration:
(i+j+k)/ii = 1;
is that the favored definition of 1?, or
of one or "of THE unit?"
> elements that were linearly independent. These aren't.
