|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: George HammondGeorge Hammond Date: Oct 23, 2006 09:52
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:47:46 GMT, George Hammond
notspam.org> wrote:
HAMMOND VS. DAWKINS
Oxford biologist Richard Dawkins is currently the worlds
most outspoken atheist. In his bestselling book THE GOD
DELUSION he says flat out that: "God almost certainly does
not exist".
http://www...
|
| Show full article (4.51Kb) |
|
| | 80 Comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Oct 23, 2006 10:01
George Hammond wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:47:46 GMT, George Hammond
> notspam.org> wrote:
>
> HAMMOND VS. DAWKINS
>
> Oxford biologist Richard Dawkins is currently the world's
> most outspoken atheist. In his bestselling book THE GOD
> DELUSION he says flat out that: "God almost certainly does
> not exist".
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNjpfBc7Jmw&NR
> Much to professor Dawkins chagrin however, American
> physicist George Hammond has discovered and published the
> world's first rigorous scientific proof of God and therefore
> proven "God does exist, and Richard Dawkins is certainly
> wrong".
|
| Show full article (4.97Kb) |
|
| | 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: Bill MBill M Date: Oct 23, 2006 12:40
I read Hammond's claim and it is worthless babble. Richard Dawkins has a
full page summary of his education and accomplishments in the Encyclopedia
Britannica. I appears Hammond is a nut case while Dawkins is a renowned
scientist.
"George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote in message
news:tospj291li0p1oc0vr5lnejnn956vpg331@4ax.com...> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:47:46 GMT, George Hammond
> notspam.org> wrote:
>
> ...
|
| Show full article (5.00Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: TurnerTurner Date: Oct 23, 2006 13:23
George Hammond wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:47:46 GMT, George Hammond
> notspam.org> wrote:
>
> HAMMOND VS. DAWKINS
>
> Oxford biologist Richard Dawkins is currently the world's
> most outspoken atheist. In his bestselling book THE GOD
> DELUSION he says flat out that: "God almost certainly does
> not exist".
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNjpfBc7Jmw&NR
> Much to professor Dawkins chagrin however, American
> physicist George Hammond has discovered and published the
> world's first rigorous scientific proof of God and therefore
> proven "God does exist, and Richard Dawkins is certainly
> wrong".
> Because of this, Hammond has been ferociously attacked by
> "Dawkinist scientists" (mainly physicists) on Usenet in
> thousands of scurrilous posts impugning his reputation and
> attempting to label him as a kook or an incompetent. Of ...
|
| Show full article (5.70Kb) |
| 4 Comments |
|
|
Author: TurnerTurner Date: Oct 23, 2006 13:24
George Hammond wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:47:46 GMT, George Hammond
> notspam.org> wrote:
>
> HAMMOND VS. DAWKINS
>
> Oxford biologist Richard Dawkins is currently the world's
> most outspoken atheist. In his bestselling book THE GOD
> DELUSION he says flat out that: "God almost certainly does
> not exist".
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNjpfBc7Jmw&NR
> Much to professor Dawkins chagrin however, American
> physicist George Hammond has discovered and published the
> world's first rigorous scientific proof of God and therefore
> proven "God does exist, and Richard Dawkins is certainly
> wrong".
> Because of this, Hammond has been ferociously attacked by
> "Dawkinist scientists" (mainly physicists) on Usenet in
> thousands of scurrilous posts impugning his reputation and
> attempting to label him as a kook or an incompetent. Of ...
|
| Show full article (5.70Kb) |
| 3 Comments |
|
|
Author: GhodGhod Date: Oct 23, 2006 13:54
>
> George Hammond wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:47:46 GMT, George Hammond
>> notspam.org> wrote:
>>
>> HAMMOND VS. DAWKINS
>>
>> Oxford biologist Richard Dawkins is currently the world's
>> most outspoken atheist. In his bestselling book THE GOD
>> DELUSION he says flat out that: "God almost certainly does
>> not exist".
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNjpfBc7Jmw&NR
>> Much to professor Dawkins chagrin however, American
>> physicist George Hammond has discovered and published the
>> world's first rigorous scientific proof of God and therefore
>> proven "God does exist, and Richard Dawkins is certainly
>> wrong"...
|
| Show full article (1.33Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: GhodGhod Date: Oct 23, 2006 14:01
>
> George Hammond wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:47:46 GMT, George Hammond
>> notspam.org> wrote:
>>
>> HAMMOND VS. DAWKINS
>>
>> Oxford biologist Richard Dawkins is currently the world's
>> most outspoken atheist. In his bestselling book THE GOD
>> DELUSION he says flat out that: "God almost certainly does
>> not exist".
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNjpfBc7Jmw&NR[snip, snip, snippety snip]
> but if you are some kind of self-deluded nutcase then don't blame
> everyone else if they reject your hypothesis.
|
| Show full article (0.85Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Jim BlackJim Black Date: Oct 23, 2006 19:01
Turner wrote:
> 1) How can you be sure that, even if you have proved the existence of
> *a* god, that god is the Christian god? It could be Yahweh, Allah, the
> Flying Spaghetti Monster or a god that we haven't yet invented.
Hammond has claimed that his discovery proves every major religion.
And while he hasn't said anything about Pastafarianism, we can show
that his SPOG "proves" the Flying Spaghetti Monster in much the same
way as it "proves" other religions:
The SPOG explains why the Flying Spaghetti Monster is said to be
"invisible" because the Flying Spaghetti Monster is the invisible part
of reality.
The SPOG shows that the "noodly appendage" which changes the results
scientists perceive is caused by a brain growth deficit, which distorts
their perception of reality by making things appear bigger and faster
than they really are.
The SPOG explains why one of the first creations of the Flying
Spaghetti Monster was a "midgit." In fact, we are all midgets because
no one has reached their full genotypic height.
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: kingdoodlesquatkingdoodlesquat Date: Oct 23, 2006 19:16
I find it particularly amusing that for all of Hammonds vitriolic attacks on
atheists & scientists (particularly physicists), he uses "science" to try to
prove the very existence of something that actually relies on faith - i.e.
no proof required.
If he is so certain god exists, he wouldn't feel the need to prove it, but
merely believe it to be the truth.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: darwinistdarwinist Date: Oct 23, 2006 20:26
Mr Hammond,
The unfulfilled potential of human brain growth is not "god", not by
any classical definition. There are a couple of metaphorical
similarities, but only a few. All of the science has no bearing on what
is, essentially a statement of metaphor.
God, whatever it is (and I'm an atheist so I think he's more of a
mythological idea), is not simply the gap between the brains that
exist, and the brains that could exist if we have perfect nutrition,
environmental conditions, etc.
Write it as fiction, not science, and change the name from "god" to
something else. You could maybe write some great science fiction, but
you haven't proven god's existence and you never will.
|
| |
| 56 Comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
