|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: BretCahillBretCahill Date: Jul 17, 2008 06:03
In order to smooth the transition from an individualist transportation
to public transportation as much as possible, I propose mounting gun
racks in public transportation.
A gun rack would be located above each seat and the guns would be
loaded and ready just in case a gun nutter "gits pushed too far."
Gun locos may not have enough dough to drive around the trailer park
but at least they will still have _something_ that's "individualist."
Bret Cahill
|
| |
|
| | 27 Comments |
|
|
Date: Jul 17, 2008 08:44
> In order to smooth the transition from an individualist transportation
> to public transportation as much as possible, I propose mounting gun
> racks in public transportation.
>
> A gun rack would be located above each seat and the guns would be
> loaded and ready just in case a gun nutter "gits pushed too far."
>
> Gun locos may not have enough dough to drive around the trailer park
> but at least they will still have _something_ that's "individualist."
>
>
> Bret Cahill
>
Good idea. When my father was young, he'd get on the city bus with his
shotgun and go rabbit hunting in the field at the end of the line ;)
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Bert HymanBert Hyman Date: Jul 17, 2008 08:50
> In order to smooth the transition from an individualist
> transportation to public transportation ...
Didn't you mean "collectivist transportation", in contrast to
"individualist transportation"?
|
| |
| 5 Comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Jul 17, 2008 10:56
On Jul 17, 8:50 am, Bert Hyman iphouse.com> wrote:>> In order to smooth the transition from an individualist
>> transportation to public transportation ...
>
> Didn't you mean "collectivist transportation", in contrast to
> "individualist transportation"?
>
A Red Herring is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented
in order to divert attention from the original issue. The basic idea
is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument
and to another topic. This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because
merely changing the topic of discussion hardly counts as an argument
against a claim.
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/red-herring.html
However absurd or incorrectly stated, the question by bret, should
there be gunracks on public transportation?
|
| Show full article (0.96Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: C3C3 Date: Jul 17, 2008 11:37
> In order to smooth the transition from an individualist transportation
> to public transportation as much as possible, I propose mounting gun
> racks in public transportation.
>
> A gun rack would be located above each seat and the guns would be
> loaded and �ready just in case a gun nutter "gits pushed too far."
>
> Gun locos may not have enough dough to drive around the trailer park
> but at least they will still have _something_ that's "individualist."
>
> Bret Cahill
It's called BART. Niggaz attempted to mug me there. lmao
C3
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Bert HymanBert Hyman Date: Jul 17, 2008 11:55
> However absurd or incorrectly stated, the question by bret, ...
So absurd that it merits no serious response.
Just like all his posts.
If you want to try to treat him as an adult, feel free, but don't
expect anything good to come from the exercise.
|
| |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: SaPeIsMaSaPeIsMa Date: Jul 17, 2008 13:24
> On Jul 17, 8:50 am, Bert Hyman iphouse.com> wrote:>>> In order to smooth the transition from an individualist
>>> transportation to public transportation ...
>>
>> Didn't you mean "collectivist transportation", in contrast to
>> "individualist transportation"?
>>
>
> A Red Herring is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented
> in order to divert attention from the original issue. The basic idea
> is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument
> and to another topic. This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because
> merely changing the topic of discussion hardly counts as an argument
> against a claim.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.17Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Jul 19, 2008 16:47
On Jul 17, 1:24 pm, "SaPeIsMa" Hotmail.com> wrote:>> On Jul 17, 8:50 am, Bert Hyman iphouse.com> wrote:>
>>>> In order to smooth the transition from an individualist
>>>> transportation to public transportation ...
>
>>> Didn't you mean "collectivist transportation", in contrast to
>>> "individualist transportation"?
>
>> A Red Herring is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented
>> in order to divert attention from the original issue. The basic idea
>> is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument ...
|
| Show full article (1.36Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: Jul 19, 2008 17:35
>> However absurd or incorrectly stated, the question by bret, ...
was about making public transit more gun friendly.
> So absurd that it merits no serious response.
> Just like all his posts.
What about mounting a target at the rear of the bus for target
practice?
Bret Cahill
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: br549br549 Date: Jul 19, 2008 20:01
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:35:17 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
aol.com> wrote:
>>> However absurd or incorrectly stated, the question by bret, ...
>
>was about making public transit more gun friendly.
>
>> So absurd that it merits no serious response.
>> Just like all his posts.
>
>What about mounting a target at the rear of the bus for target
>practice?
>
>
>Bret Cahill
|
| Show full article (0.64Kb) |
| 4 Comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
