| Re: Greespan, Bernake, other slike them, and their Responsibilities? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: SeanSean Date: Sep 19, 2008 18:29
> Sean wrote:
>> Given recent and unfolding events, is there any philosophical, ethical,
>> legal, civil, or moral requirement for Alan Greenspan, and all others
>> who
>> hold similar "responsibilities" for the Financial System in the United
>> States to be held fully responsible for anything..... such as a breach
>> of
>> contract of employment, non-performance of employment contract, or say
>> an
>> unconscionable deriliction of duty?
>
> First we hang them, and then give them a fair trial. But who is they?
>
> You see, the morons at the very top don't believe they are human beings:
> they believe they evince the pinnacle of the corporate entity. They have
> no responsibility to anyone and do anything they can get away with. They
> are the epitome of human evil.
>
> Pierce the corporate veil - with extreme prejudice.
I was fighting a court case against on such person a few years ago. In
Aus, you can have a one director proprietory company, so my case was
against his company, who went out of "its" way to cheat me, so I wasnt
attacking his assets protected by his company structure, I was
defending myself. (He was the director of his own company).
I not only won, but the judge made it very clear what she thought of
his reprensible behaviour.
When it came time for damages and costs, she informed me that unless I
had informed him that we would chase him in his own right for them,
she could not award either.
Her comments spoke volumes. "As a judge, I would penetrate the
corporate vale at my peril". She could see the injustice she was bound
by.
Of course, my lawyer knew this, but thats a whole different story :-)
BOfL
BOfL
------------------------------------------------
Sean:
Yet another reason not to trust someone in the system, to go to the Library
and be your own defense lawyer. I can't recall when a Lawyer has given me
the correct advice but once, and she was "pro bono". She was so good in
fact, and had I had done my homework so well, that I was the first
non-custodial parent to get not only legal aid, but won the case against the
ATO/Child Support Agency hands down.
They still owe me 6 plus years of my life, but in the long run it turned out
for the best.
Interesting co-incidence Brian ? The lawyer was the youngest daughter of my
eldests sons Pediatrician who played a significant role in an emergency
ceasear.
|