| Re: Greespan, Bernake, other slike them, and their Responsibilities? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: SeanSean Date: Sep 19, 2008 18:19
"John J" wrote in message
news:TvednT5wlvgn507VnZ2dnUVZ_hidnZ2d@supernews.com...> Sean wrote:
>> Given recent and unfolding events, is there any philosophical, ethical,
>> legal, civil, or moral requirement for Alan Greenspan, and all others who
>> hold similar "responsibilities" for the Financial System in the United
>> States to be held fully responsible for anything..... such as a breach
>> of contract of employment, non-performance of employment contract, or say
>> an unconscionable deriliction of duty?
>
> First we hang them, and then give them a fair trial. But who is they?
>
> You see, the morons at the very top don't believe they are human beings:
> they believe they evince the pinnacle of the corporate entity. They have
> no responsibility to anyone and do anything they can get away with. They
> are the epitome of human evil.
>
> Pierce the corporate veil - with extreme prejudice.
I don't think that's the issue or solution. The "they" you mention can
actually be determined, and named.
Evil has nothing to do with it. Human nature has a history of people doing
whatever it is they can get away with. If you leave the barn yard door open,
"they" will steal your sheep.
The problem isn't "them" it's all the many many "you's" that do not hold
anyone accountable for their actions, and who are so easily swayed by false
emotive arguments that simply do not add up to be reasonable or logical.
imho
Apparently, the majority don't care, or don't understand the shell and pea
game being played for decades. I say apparently, because I don't really
know. But the lack of wisdom and insight is unnerving. As is repeating the
same old solutions that have clearly shown don't work. which is why recently
I posted a working definition of insanity. :)
| 
