| Re: Greespan, Bernake, other slike them, and their Responsibilities? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Sep 19, 2008 17:25
On Sep 19, 8:11Â pm, John J wrote:
> Sean wrote:
>> Given recent and unfolding events, is there any philosophical, ethical,
>> legal, civil, or moral requirement for Alan Greenspan, and all others who
>> hold similar "responsibilities" for the Financial System in the United
>> States to be held fully responsible for anything..... Â such as a breach of
>> contract of employment, non-performance of employment contract, or say an
>> unconscionable deriliction of duty?
>
> First we hang them, and then give them a fair trial. But who is they?
>
> You see, the morons at the very top don't believe they are human beings:
> they believe they evince the pinnacle of the corporate entity. They have
> no responsibility to anyone and do anything they can get away with. They
> are the epitome of human evil.
>
> Pierce the corporate veil - with extreme prejudice.
I was fighting a court case against on such person a few years ago. In
Aus, you can have a one director proprietory company, so my case was
against his company, who went out of "its" way to cheat me, so I wasnt
attacking his assets protected by his company structure, I was
defending myself. (He was the director of his own company).
I not only won, but the judge made it very clear what she thought of
his reprensible behaviour.
When it came time for damages and costs, she informed me that unless I
had informed him that we would chase him in his own right for them,
she could not award either.
Her comments spoke volumes. "As a judge, I would penetrate the
corporate vale at my peril". She could see the injustice she was bound
by.
Of course, my lawyer knew this, but thats a whole different story :-)
BOfL
BOfL
| 
