|
|
Up |
  |
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: Sep 15, 2008 12:02
How many financial institutions must go under before a broad majority
of monied interests admits I'm correct, that a vibrant market economy
is 100%% dependent on free speech on economic issues?
I've done my part. I've already admitted Churchill was correct about
us.
Bret Cahill
"You can always count on the Americans to do the right thing, after
they exhaust all other options."
-- Winston Churchill
"The imPOOOORtant flag burner issue."
-- Corp. media shill
|
| |
| 4 Comments |
|
  |
Author: ShrikebackShrikeback Date: Sep 15, 2008 13:43
On Sep 15, 12:02 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
> How many financial institutions must go under before a broad majority
> of monied interests admits I'm correct, that a vibrant market economy
> is 100%% dependent on free speech on economic issues?
Since you have already determined to your satisfaction
that China has "free speech on economic issues," can
we assume that we know what it is that you want?
|
| Show full article (0.94Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Fred WeissFred Weiss Date: Sep 15, 2008 20:06
On Sep 15, 4:43 pm, Shrikeb...@ gmail.com wrote:
> On Sep 15, 12:02 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>
>> How many financial institutions must go under before a broad majority
>> of monied interests admits I'm correct, that a vibrant market economy
>> is 100%% dependent on free speech on economic issues?
>
> Since you have already determined to your satisfaction
> that China has "free speech on economic issues," can
> we assume that we know what it is that you want?
Apparently he wants what has happened to the Shanghai Stock Exchange
Index which - reflecting China's "vibrant market economy - is down
over 60%% in the last year - from a high of a bit over 6,000 last fall,
it has fallen to 2,000. That is a drop of over 60%%.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=000001.SS
Fred Weiss
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: ShrikebackShrikeback Date: Sep 15, 2008 20:55
On Sep 15, 8:06 pm, Fred Weiss papertig.com> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 4:43 pm, Shrikeb...@ gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Sep 15, 12:02 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>
>>> How many financial institutions must go under before a broad majority
>>> of monied interests admits I'm correct, that a vibrant market economy
>>> is 100%% dependent on free speech on economic issues?
>
>> Since you have already determined to your satisfaction
>> that China has "free speech on economic issues," can
>> we assume that we know what it is that you want?
>
> Apparently he wants what has happened to the Shanghai Stock Exchange
> Index which - reflecting China's "vibrant market economy - is down
> over 60%% in the last year - from a high of a bit over 6,000 last fall,
> it has fallen to 2,000. That is a drop of over 60%%.
>
> http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=000001.SS
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.31Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: SeanSean Date: Sep 15, 2008 21:15
> On Sep 15, 12:02 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>
>> How many financial institutions must go under before a broad majority
>> of monied interests admits I'm correct, that a vibrant market economy
>> is 100%% dependent on free speech on economic issues?
>
> Since you have already determined to your satisfaction
> that China has "free speech on economic issues," can
> we assume that we know what it is that you want?
Apparently he wants what has happened to the Shanghai Stock Exchange
Index which - reflecting China's "vibrant market economy - is down
over 60%% in the last year - from a high of a bit over 6,000 last fall,
it has fallen to 2,000. That is a drop of over 60%%.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=000001.SS
Fred Weiss
------------------------------------
|
| Show full article (1.30Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|