|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Kickin' Goober's Faggot AssKickin' Goober's Faggot Ass Date: Sep 17, 2007 12:57
On Sep 17, 9:24 am, Rudy Canoza thedismalscience.net> wrote:> Goo (Fuckwit David Harrison) is the only one who has
> introduced animal "pre-existence" as something to be
> considered. The literal words "pre-existence" are not
> found in his blabbering, but they are undeniably
> implied by what he has written:
>
> The animals that will be raised for us to eat
> are more than just "nothing", because they
> *will* be born unless something stops their
> lives from happening. Since that is the case,
> if something stops their lives from happening,
> whatever it is that stops it is truly "denying"
> them of the life they otherwise would have had.
> Fuckwit - 12/09/1999
>
> Yes, it is the unborn animals that will be
> born if nothing prevents that from happening,
> that would experience the loss if their lives
> are prevented. ...
|
| Show full article (2.34Kb) |
|
| | 56 Comments |
|
|
Author: Rudy CanozaRudy Canoza Date: Sep 17, 2007 13:43
On Sep 17, 12:57 pm, Kickin' Goober's Faggot Ass
excite.com> wrote:> On Sep 17, 9:24 am, Rudy Canoza thedismalscience.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> Goo (Fuckwit David Harrison) is the only one who has
>> introduced animal "pre-existence" as something to be
>> considered. The literal words "pre-existence" are not
>> found in his blabbering, but they are undeniably
>> implied by what he has written:
>
>> The animals that will be raised for us to eat
>> are more than just "nothing", because they
>> *will* be born unless something stops their
>> lives from happening. Since that is the case,
>> if something stops their lives from happening,
>> whatever it is that stops it is truly "denying" ...
|
| Show full article (3.18Kb) |
|
| | 6 Comments |
|
|
Author: Kickin' Goober's Faggot AssKickin' Goober's Faggot Ass Date: Sep 18, 2007 12:30
On Sep 17, 2:43 pm, Rudy Canoza yahoo.com> wrote:> On Sep 17, 12:57 pm, Kickin' Goober's Faggot Ass
>
>
>
>
>
> excite.com> wrote:>> On Sep 17, 9:24 am, Rudy Canoza thedismalscience.net> wrote:>
>>> Goo (Fuckwit David Harrison) is the only one who has
>>> introduced animal "pre-existence" as something to be
>>> considered. The literal words "pre-existence" are not
>>> found in his blabbering, but they are undeniably
>>> implied by what he has written:
>
>>> The animals that will be raised for us to eat
>>> are more than just "nothing", because they
>>> *will* be born unless something stops their
>>> lives from happening. Since that is the case, ...
|
| Show full article (3.59Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Sep 19, 2007 11:15
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, rightly ashamed of himself and now in
quite an amusing state of denial, Goo lied:
>I never said they "move from 'pre-existence'"
"When the entity moves from "pre-existence" into the
existence we know, we don't know if that move improves
its welfare, degrades it, or leaves it unchanged.
Unless we know with certainty that the entity's welfare
improves when it moves from "pre-existence" - Goo
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a stupid Goober...LOL......
|
| |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
Date: Sep 19, 2007 11:20
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:32:10 +0100, Derek gmail.com> wrote:
>>>what was that relative
>>>position of the beneficiary before life if not
>>>dead or unborn?
> [Harrison]
>> Matter composing something else...sometimes
>>something living or sometimes not.
If you think you disagree, try explaining how you
think you do.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Rudy CanozaRudy Canoza Date: Sep 19, 2007 11:45
Goo - that's Fuckwit David Harrison - hopelessly
overmatched and working overtime to be stupid, lied and
presented no challenge:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>
>> I never said they "move from 'pre-existence'"
>
> "When the entity moves from "pre-existence" [snip remaining mangled quote]
That's not all of what I wrote, Goo. Try again, but
this time reproduce the *entire* quote.
You lied, Goo. Mangling quotes to make them appear to
say something other than what they really said is
lying. You're the most dishonest person you know.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Rudy CanozaRudy Canoza Date: Sep 19, 2007 11:54
You got beat like a mean dog *again*, Goo! You just
never tire of getting your ass kicked; very bizarre.
Goo - that's Fuckwit David Harrison - hopelessly
overmatched and working overtime to be stupid, lied and
presented no challenge:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>
>> I never said they "move from 'pre-existence'"
>
> "When the entity moves from "pre-existence" into the
> existence we know, we don't know if that move improves
> its welfare, degrades it, or leaves it unchanged.
> Unless we know with certainty that the entity's welfare
> improves when it moves from "pre-existence"
Here's what I wrote:
No living entity benefits by coming into existence.
Why not?
|
| Show full article (1.71Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Rudy CanozaRudy Canoza Date: Sep 19, 2007 11:55
Goo - that's Fuckwit David Harrison - hopelessly
overmatched and working overtime to be stupid, lied and
presented no challenge:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:32:10 +0100, Derek gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> what was that relative
>>>> position of the beneficiary before life if not
>>>> dead or unborn?
>> [Harrison]
>>> Matter composing something else...sometimes
>>> something living or sometimes not.
>
> If you think you disagree, try explaining how you
> think you do.
Write in English, you fucking cracker.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: The Voice of ReasonThe Voice of Reason Date: Sep 19, 2007 12:50
dh@. wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:32:10 +0100, Derek gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> what was that relative
>>>> position of the beneficiary before life if not
>>>> dead or unborn?
>> [Harrison]
>>> Matter composing something else...sometimes
>>> something living or sometimes not.
>
> If you think you disagree, try explaining how you
> think you do.
Learn to speak English you illiterate clot.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Kickin' Goober's Faggot AssKickin' Goober's Faggot Ass Date: Sep 19, 2007 13:09
On Sep 19, 12:50 pm, The Voice of Reason spammers.net> wrote:> dh@. wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:32:10 +0100, Derek gmail.com> wrote:>
>>>>> what was that relative
>>>>> position of the beneficiary before life if not
>>>>> dead or unborn?
>>> [Harrison]
>>>> Matter composing something else...sometimes
>>>> something living or sometimes not.
>
>> If you think you disagree, try explaining how you
>> think you do.
>
> Learn to speak English you illiterate clot.
Goo is getting frantic. He's using more nyms.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
