Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE         


Author: George Hammond
Date: May 7, 2008 19:37

On Thu, 08 May 2008 02:09:57 GMT, George Hammond
notspam.org> wrote:

On Tue, 6 May 2008 23:26:30 -0700 (PDT), "Dr. HotSalt"
gmail.com> wrote:
>On May 5, 4:40 pm, "Varekem" archangels.mil> wrote:
>
>(brevity snip)
>
>>[Varekem]
>> Sheesh Mark.So he isnt saying a real God exists, just that our lack of
>> growth makes us think there...
Show full article (16.72Kb)
9 Comments
Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE         


Author: John Smith
Date: May 8, 2008 12:14

"George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote in message
news:o8p424pc29ndbeeiqec580mmogcnn7u4i5@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 08 May 2008 02:09:57 GMT, George Hammond
> notspam.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 May 2008 23:26:30 -0700 (PDT), "Dr. HotSalt"
> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On May 5, 4:40 pm, "Varekem" archangels.mil> wrote:
>>
>>(brevity snip)
>>
>>>[Varekem]
>>> Sheesh Mark.So he isnt saying a real God exists, just that our lack of
>>> growth makes us think there is one and creates the false illusion?
>>
>> [Mark L. Fergerson]
>> No. I am saying that what he says is _partly_ correct, that humans
>>are capable only of observing that which we are capable of observing.
>>That would be a simple tautology except for the BGD (Brain Growth ...
Show full article (5.14Kb)
no comments
Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE         


Author: George Hammond
Date: May 8, 2008 13:27

On Thu, 08 May 2008 19:14:02 GMT, "John Smith"
yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>"George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote in message
>news:o8p424pc29ndbeeiqec580mmogcnn7u4i5@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 08 May 2008 02:09:57 GMT, George Hammond
>> notspam.org> wrote:
>>...
Show full article (5.89Kb)
no comments
Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE         


Author: John Smith
Date: May 9, 2008 09:19

"George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote in message
news:2do62498b4k8ehicpkp0ctvgpjh16tlkfq@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 08 May 2008 19:14:02 GMT, "John Smith"
> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>[John Smith, sham rage heckler]
>>Unsupported (crap, insane, unscientific) assertion.
>>
>>Also - up to this point you have SELECTIVELY been "reading wht isn't
>>there" - and coming to the deranged conclusion that this person's comments
>>agree with the totality of your crap!
>>
>>
> [Hammond]
> This person has been a regular commenter on the SPOG for
> more than 8 years. He is well known to me and I am familiar
> with his views.
> Get off this thread Smith, take your heckling somewhere
> else.
Show full article (1.15Kb)
no comments
Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE         


Author: Danwood
Date: May 9, 2008 10:09

"George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote in message
news:2do62498b4k8ehicpkp0ctvgpjh16tlkfq@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 08 May 2008 19:14:02 GMT, "John Smith"
> yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote in message
>>news:o8p424pc29ndbeeiqec580mmogcnn7u4i5@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 08 May 2008 02:09:57 GMT, George Hammond
>>> notspam.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 6 May 2008 23:26:30 -0700 (PDT), "Dr. HotSalt"
>>> gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On May 5, 4:40 pm, "Varekem" archangels.mil> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>(brevity snip)
>>>>
>>>>>[Varekem]
>>>>> Sheesh Mark.So he isnt saying a real God exists, just that our lack of ...
Show full article (6.23Kb)
no comments
Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE         


Author: George Hammond
Date: May 9, 2008 10:37

On Fri, 09 May 2008 16:19:22 GMT, "John Smith"
yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>"George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote in message
>news:2do62498b4k8ehicpkp0ctvgpjh16tlkfq@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 08 May 2008 19:14:02 GMT, "John Smith"
>> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>...
Show full article (1.71Kb)
no comments
Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE         


Author: George Hammond
Date: May 9, 2008 10:42

On Fri, 9 May 2008 13:09:31 -0400, "Danwood"
bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>"George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote in message
>news:2do62498b4k8ehicpkp0ctvgpjh16tlkfq@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 08 May 2008 19:14:02 GMT, "John Smith"
>> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>...
Show full article (6.70Kb)
no comments
Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE         


Author: John Smith
Date: May 10, 2008 00:18

"Danwood" bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1y%%Uj.60404$%%15.42199@bignews7.bellsouth.net...
>
> "George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote in message
> news:2do62498b4k8ehicpkp0ctvgpjh16tlkfq@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 08 May 2008 19:14:02 GMT, "John Smith"
>> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote in message
>>>news:o8p424pc29ndbeeiqec580mmogcnn7u4i5@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 08 May 2008 02:09:57 GMT, George Hammond
>>>> notspam.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 6 May 2008 23:26:30 -0700 (PDT), "Dr. HotSalt"
>>>> gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On May 5, 4:40 pm, "Varekem" archangels.mil> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>(brevity snip) ...
Show full article (6.30Kb)
no comments
Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE         


Author: George Hammond
Date: May 10, 2008 03:32

On Sat, 10 May 2008 07:18:53 GMT, "John Smith"
yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>"Danwood" bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>news:1y%%Uj.60404$%%15.42199@bignews7.bellsouth.net...
>>
>> "George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote in message
>> news:2do62498b4k8ehicpkp0ctvgpjh16tlkfq@4ax...
Show full article (7.12Kb)
no comments
Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE         


Author: Lorrill Buyens
Date: May 11, 2008 22:15

On Fri, 09 May 2008 17:37:21 GMT, Temporal Voyager George Hammond
notspam.org>, in a desperate attempt to change the sci.skeptic
timestream, said:
>On Fri, 09 May 2008 16:19:22 GMT, "John Smith"
>yahoo.com> wrote:
>>Doesn't change the fact, either, that - as usual again - you bellow and
>>insult and run away ......... without addressing the point.
>>
>>You're nothing more than a fraudulent pile of shit.
>[Hammond]
> Go back to your job parking cars and stop heckling
>scientific discussions.

When you come up with one, be sure to let us know.

--
"One does wonder why God went to the trouble of making Man
rational, since there's evidently no bloody use for reason
whatsoever."
- Alan Hope, in a religious discussion in misc.writing
no comments