>
>"George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote in message
>news:a3312450pbijegp2ap6r152c9k7ips112h@4ax.com...

>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 14:26:44 GMT, "John Smith"
>> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>

>>>
>>>"George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote in message
>>>news:lumv14h8qoso11daftolpkr9i3r3jogsd8@4ax.com...

>>>> On Mon, 05 May 2008 19:53:46 -0700, none <""doug\"@(none)">
>>>> wrote:
>>>>

>>>>>Michael Moroney wrote:

>>>>>> George Hammond notspam.org> writes:
>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Hey, Phd physicist; tell us how a dog whistle works.....
>>>>>>> tell us why half of the audible reality that a dog can hear
>>>>>>> is audibally INVISIBLE to a human being?
>>>>>>> From that maybe you can figure out why the fact that a
>>>>>>> kid has HALF the movie Picture Fusion Frequency of and adult
>>>>>>> means that half the world that an adult can see is invisible
>>>>>>> to the kid.

>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually George has this backwards (no surprise here). Kids can hear
>>>>>> higher frequencies than adults and the ability to hear high
>>>>>> frequencies
>>>>>> decreases with age. Google "mosquito ringtone" to see how kids take
>>>>>> advantage of this in schools and elsewhere.

>>>>>
>>>>>[Doug, alleged physicist, SPOG heckler]
>>>>>Maybe that means that god is a very young person when he listens to
>>>>>things and a very old one when he watches things. That cannot be
>>>>>right though since light travels faster than sound.
>>>>>
>>>>>

>>>> [Hammond]
>>>> Don't be ridiculous. You've been told a thousand times
>>>> that children are only an EXEMPLAR of the effect that
>>>> actually causes "God" in the population, and that is the
>>>> Secular Trend in Human Growth, which causes the average
>>>> person in the human population to only reach about 80%% of
>>>> full growth...... and this is WHY there is a "God". Stupid
>>>> huckster.

>>>
>>>Unsupported (insane, psychotic and unscientific) assertion ............
>>>where's the EVIDENCE, shithole??????
>>>
>>>
>>>

>> [Hammond]
>> For the tenth time jackass, the eivdence is cited
>> meticulously by (author, year) in my peer published papers:
>> Peer reviewed publications:
>>
>> Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
>> New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
>> Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
>> paper is posted at:
>> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/cart.html
>>
>> Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God
>> Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic
>> Press)
>> Online copy of peer/published paper is posted at:
>> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Hammond5s1.html

>
>
>
>For the 100th time, shit for brains (posted by me and others) Those are NOT
>"Scientific Peer reviewed journals".
>Even THEY admit to that!
>
>

>
>