Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: John Smith
Date: May 6, 2008 13:26

"George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote in message
news:a3312450pbijegp2ap6r152c9k7ips112h@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 06 May 2008 14:26:44 GMT, "John Smith"
> yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote in message
>>news:lumv14h8qoso11daftolpkr9i3r3jogsd8@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 05 May 2008 19:53:46 -0700, none <""doug\"@(none)">
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Michael Moroney wrote:
>>>>> George Hammond notspam.org> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey, Phd physicist; tell us how a dog whistle works.....
>>>>>> tell us why half of the audible reality that a dog can hear
>>>>>> is audibally INVISIBLE to a human being?
>>>>>> From that maybe you can figure out why the fact that a
>>>>>> kid has HALF the movie Picture Fusion Frequency of and adult
>>>>>> means that half the world that an adult can see is invisible
>>>>>> to the kid.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually George has this backwards (no surprise here). Kids can hear
>>>>> higher frequencies than adults and the ability to hear high
>>>>> frequencies
>>>>> decreases with age. Google "mosquito ringtone" to see how kids take
>>>>> advantage of this in schools and elsewhere.
>>>>
>>>>[Doug, alleged physicist, SPOG heckler]
>>>>Maybe that means that god is a very young person when he listens to
>>>>things and a very old one when he watches things. That cannot be
>>>>right though since light travels faster than sound.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> [Hammond]
>>> Don't be ridiculous. You've been told a thousand times
>>> that children are only an EXEMPLAR of the effect that
>>> actually causes "God" in the population, and that is the
>>> Secular Trend in Human Growth, which causes the average
>>> person in the human population to only reach about 80%% of
>>> full growth...... and this is WHY there is a "God". Stupid
>>> huckster.
>>
>>Unsupported (insane, psychotic and unscientific) assertion ............
>>where's the EVIDENCE, shithole??????
>>
>>
>>
> [Hammond]
> For the tenth time jackass, the eivdence is cited
> meticulously by (author, year) in my peer published papers:
> Peer reviewed publications:
>
> Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
> New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
> Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
> paper is posted at:
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/cart.html
>
> Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God
> Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic
> Press)
> Online copy of peer/published paper is posted at:
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Hammond5s1.html

For the 100th time, shit for brains (posted by me and others) Those are NOT
"Scientific Peer reviewed journals".
Even THEY admit to that!

You have NEVER shown ANY connection between the works you cite - and the
crap you spew.
You have only added to the pile of horse shit you shovel!

I can claim "Pat Boone's singing of "Blue Suede Shoes" proves that I am god.
It means NOTHING unless I can show a VALID and SCIENTIFIC connection between
the two.

Were you a real scientist, you would recognize that!
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!