Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: George Hammond
Date: May 3, 2008 21:40

On Sun, 04 May 2008 03:52:01 GMT, "John Smith"
yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>"George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote in message
>news:8upp14th2no480ghcbko8jprnsuurptd16@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 03 May 2008 20:51:39 GMT, "John Smith"
>> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Unsupported assertion!
>>>There were NO experiments perormed.
>>>Please, disprove that and show some!!!!!!
>>>
>>>
>> [Hammond]
>> LIAR. Here's a list of the Psychmetric experiments taken
>> from the bibliography opf my 1994 peer published paper
>> (Pergam Press), you don't know what you're talking about,
>> and you are a LIAR:
>>
>> REFERENCE
>>
[
>
>[John Smith, atheist, raving S.P.O.G. critic]
>?????????????????
>This, unless you warp it just as much as you psychotically warp everything
>else, has nothing to do with your SPO Crap!
>There's nothing here that is even remoely related to physics!
>
>All of these things are related to social behavior and psychology ....
>fields in which you have ABSOLUTELY NO degree!
>IOW - your claimed CV's mean NOTHING here.
>
[Hammond]
All of these are published reports of EXPERIMENTAL Factor
Analytic eigenvector extractions from experimental
psychological correlation matrices. What I've discovered
is what CAUSES THE EIGENVECTOR STRUCTURE, and that is a
PHYSICS problem, because it turns out to be a:

EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF
SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME (i.e. "GOD")
THAT CAUSES THE CURVATURE.
>Social studies and psychology are not "hard" sciences; so make a "hard
>(physics) science" conclusion using them is mere FRAUD.
>
>
>
[Hammond]
Baloney, what it provides is a concise PHYSICS
explanation of God. Get out of here, you're an uneducated,
scientifically illiterate asshole. Whddau think, an
ignorant asshole like you is qualified to understand the
world's first scientific proof of God..... getoutta here!
>
>
>
>> BRAND, C.R. (1995) Dimensionalizing personality: The "Big
>> 5", the "Gigantic 3"
>> CARROLL, J.B. (1953). An analytical solution for
>> approximating simple structure
>> in factor analysis. Psychometrika, Vol. 18, pp. 23-38
>> COSTA, P.T., & McCRAE R.R. (1985). The NEO Personality
>> Inventory Manual.
>> Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources
>> COSTA P.T., McCRAE R.R. & DYE D.A. (1991), Facet Scales for
>> Agreeableness
>> and
>> Conscientiousness: A Revision of the NEO Personality
>> Inventory, Personality
>> and Individual Differences, Vol. 12, No. 9, pp. 887-898
>> COSTA P.T. & McCRAE R.R. (1992), Revised NEO Personality
>> inventory (NEO
>> PI-RTM)
>> and NEO Five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual.
>> Odessa, FL:
>> Psychological Assessment Resources
>> COSTA P.T. & McCRAE R.R. (1992a), Four Ways Five Factors are
>> Basic,
>> Personality
>> and Individual Differences, Vol.13, No.6, pp. 653-665
>> DE RAAD, B. &, HOFSTEE W.K.B. (1993). A circumplex approach
>> to the five factor
>> model: A facet structure of trait adjectives supplemented by
>> trait verbs.
>> Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 15, No. 5,
>> 493-505
>> DIGMAN, J.M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the
>> Five-Factor
>> model.
>> Annual Revue of Psychology, 41, 417-440
>> EYSENCK H.J. (1944a), General Social Attitudes, Journal of
>> Social Psychology,
>> 19, 207-227
>> EYSENCK, H.J. (1944b). Types of personality- a factorial
>> study of 700
>> neurotics.
>> Journal of Mental Science, 90, 851-861
>> EYSENCK H.J. (1947), Dimensions of Personality. London,
>> U.K.: Routledge
>> EYSENCK, H.J. (1950). Clyclothymia-schizothymia as a
>> dimension of personality.
>> I. Historical review. Journal of Personality, 19, 123-153
>> EYSENCK H.J. (1952), The Scientific Study of Personality,
>> Routledge & Kegan
>> Paul, London
>> EYSENCK H.J. (1954), The Psychology of Politics, London,
>> U.K.: Routledge
>> EYSENCK, H.J. (1964). Principles and methods of personality
>> description,
>> classification and diagnosis. British Journal of Psychology,
>> 55, 3, 285-294
>> EYSENCK H.J. (1967), The Biological Basis of Personality.
>> Springfield, IL:
>> Charles C. Thomas
>> EYSENCK, H.J. (1970), The Structure of Human
>> Personality,(3rd ed.), Methuen,
>> London
>> (Ed.), New Approaches to Personality Classification. New
>> York: Columbia
>> University Press
>> EYSENCK, H.J. (1971), Social Attitudes and Social Class,
>> Brit. J. Soc. Clin.
>> Psychol., 10, 201-212
>> EYSENCK H.J. (1976), The Measurement of Personality,
>> Lancaster
>> EYSENCK H.J. (1991), Dimensions of Personality: 16, 5 or 3?-
>> Criteria for a
>> Taxonomic Paradigm, Person. Individ. Diff., Vol. 12, No. 8,
>> 773-790
>> EYSENCK H.J. (1992), Four Ways Five Factors Are Not Basic,
>> Personality &
>> Individual Differences, Vol. 13, No. 6, 667-673
>> EYSENCK, H.J. (1992b). The definition and measurement of
>> Psychoticism.
>> Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 13, 7, 757-785
>> EYSENCK H.J. & EYSENCK S.B.G. (1969), Personality Structure
>> & Measurement,
>> Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
>> EYSENCK H.J. & EYSENCK S.B.G (1976), Psychoticism as a
>> Dimension of
>> Personality.
>> London: Hodder & Stoughton
>> EYSENCK H.J. & WILSON G.D. (1978), The Psychological Basis
>> of Ideology,
>> University Park Press, Baltimore
>> FERGUSON G.A. (1954), The concept of parsimony in factor
>> analysis.
>> Psychometrika, vol. 19, pp. 281-290
>> FERGUSON L.W. (1939), Primary Social Attitudes, J.
>> Psychology, 8, 217-223
>> FERGUSON L.W. (1973), Primary Social Attitudes of the 1960s
>> and Those of the
>> 1930s, Psychological Reports, 33,655-664
>> FRANCIS, L.J. (1993). The dual nature of the Eysenckian
>> Neuroticism scales: A
>> question of sex differences? Personality and Individual
>> Differences, Vol 15,
>> 1, 43-59
>>
>> GOLDBERG, L.R. (1981), Language and Individual Differences:
>> The Search for
>> Universals in Personality Lexicons, In L. Wheeler (Ed.),
>> Review of Persoality
>> and Social Psychology, Vol.2, pp. 141-165, Beverly Hills CA:
>> Sage
>> GOLDBERG, L.R. (1990), An Alternative "Description of
>> Personality": The
>> Big-Five
>> Factor Structure, Journal of Personality and Social
>> Psychology, 59, 1216-1229
>> GOLDBERG, L.R. (1992), The Development of markers for the
>> Big-Five factor
>> structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, pp. 26-42
>> GOLDBERG, L.R. (1993), The Structure of Phenotypic
>> Personality Traits,
>> American
>> Psychologist,48, 26-34
>> GORSUCH, R.L. (1983), Factor Analysis, London: Erlbaum
>> GRAY J.A. (1970), The Psychophysiological Basis of
>> Introversion-Extroversion,
>> Behav. Res. Ther., 8, 249-266
>> GRAY J.A. (1972), The Psychophysiological Basis of
>> Introversion-Extraversion:
>> A Modification of Eysenck's Theory, In: Nebylitsyn V.D.,
>> Gray J.A. (eds.),
>> The Biological Basis of Individual Behavior, pp. 185-205,
>> The Academic Press,
>> New York
>> GRAY J.A. (1981), A Critique of Eysenck's Theory of
>> Personality, In: Eysenck
>> H.J. (ed.), A Model for Personality, Springer, New York
>> GRAY J.A. (1982), The Neuropsychology of Anxiety, An Enquiry
>> Into the
>> Functions
>> of the Septohippocampal System, Oxford University Press, New
>> York
>> GRAY J.A. (1987a), The Psychology of Fear and Stress, second
>> edition,
>> Cambridge
>> University Press, Cambridge, England
>> Neurochemistry, Oxford
>> University Press, Oxford, England
>> GRAY J.A. (1987c), Perspectives on Anxiety and Impulsivity:
>> A Commentary,
>> Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 21, 493-509
>> HAMMOND, G.E. (1994). The Cartesian Theory: Unification of
>> Eysenck and Gray,
>> New
>> Ideas in Psychology,Vol. 12, 2, 153-167
>> HARMAN, H.H. (1976), Modern Factor Analysis (3rd ed.),
>> Chicago: University of
>> Chicago Press
>> HENDRICKSON A.E. & WHITE P.O. (1964), PROMAX: A quick method
>> for
>> rotation to
>> oblique simple structure. British Journal of Statistical
>> Psychology, vol. 17,
>> pp. 65-70
>> HEYMANS G. (1929), Inleiding in de speciale psychologie
>> [Introduction into
>> special psychology]. Haarlem, Bohn
>> HOFSTEE, W.K.B., De RAAD, B., & GOLDBERG L.R. (1992).
>> Integration of the Big-
>> Five and Circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal
>> of Personality and
>> Social Psychology, 63, 146-163
>> HOFSTEE W.K.B. (1994a), The Abridged Big Five Circumplex
>> (AB5C) Model of
>> Trait
>> Structure: Heymans' Cube, Kiesler's Circle and Peabody and
>> Goldberg's Double
>> Cone Model, Revue europeenne de Psychologie Applique, 1st
>> trimestre, vol. 44,
>> No. 1, pp. 27-33
>> HORST, P.A. (1941), A non-graphical method for transforming
>> an arbitrary
>> factor
>> matrix into a simple structure matrix, Psychometrika, vol.
>> 6, pp. 79-99
>> JOHN O.P. (1990), The "Big Five" Factor Taxonomy: Dimensions
>> of Personality in
>> the Natural Language and Questionnaires, In: L. Pervin
>> (ed.), Handbook of
>> Personality: Theory and Research, 66-100, Guilford, New York
>> JOHNSON, J.A. &, OSTENDORF, F. (1993). Clarification of the
>> five-factor model
>> with the abridged big five dimensional circumplex. Journal
>> of Personality and
>> Social Psychology, Vol. 65, No. 3, 563-576
>> KAISER, H.F. (1958). The Varimax criterion for analytic
>> rotation in factor
>> analysis. Psychometrika, vol. 23(3), pp. 187-200
>> KRUG S.E. & JOHNS E.F. (1986), A Large Scale
>> Cross-Validation of Second-Order
>> Personality Structure Defined by the 16PF, Psychological
>> Reports, 59, 683-693
>> MERENDA P.F. (1987), Toward a Four-Factor Theory of
>> Temperament and/or
>> Personality, Journal of Personality Assessment, 51(3),
>> 367-374
>> MERENDA P.F. (1989), Four-factor models of personality and
>> Walter Clarke's
>> Activity Vector Analysis. Tenth Clarke Memorial Lecture,
>> Bryant College,
>> Providence RI, November 30, 1989. (Available from Peter F.
>> Merenda)
>> MERENDA P.F. & CLARKE W.V. (1959), Factor analysis of a
>> measure of social
>> self.
>> Psychological Reports, 5, pp. 597-605
>> NEUHAUS J.O. & WRIGLEY C. (1954), The Quartimax method: an
>> analytical
>> approach
>> to orthogonal simple structure. British Journal of
>> Statistical Psychology,
>> vol. 7, pp. 81-91
>> NORMAN, W.T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of
>> personality attributes:
>> replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality
>> ratings. Journal
>> of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583
>> O'BOYLE, M., & HOLZER, C. (1992). DSM-III-R personality
>> disorders and
>> Eysenck's
>> personality dimensions. Personality and Individual
>> Differences, Vol. 13, No.
>> 10, 1157-1159
>> PEABODY, D. (1970). Evaluative and descriptive aspects in
>> personality
>> perception: A reappraisal. Journal of personality and social
>> psychology,
>> 1970, Vol.16, 4, 639-646
>> PEABODY, D. (1984). Personality dimensions through trait
>> inferences. Journal
>> of
>> personality and social psychology, Vol.46, 2, 384-403
>> PEABODY, D. (1987). Selecting representative trait
>> adjectives. Journal of
>> personality and social psychology, Vol.52, 1, 59-71
>> PEABODY, D., & GOLDBERG L.R. (1989). Some determinants of
>> factor structures
>> from
>> personality-trait descriptors. Journal of personality and
>> social psychology,
>> Vol.57, 3, 552-567
>> RAY J. (1986), Eysenck on social attitudes: An historical
>> critique, In S.
>> Modgil
>> & C. Modgil (Eds.), Hans Eysenck, Consensus and Controversy,
>> Falmer, U.K.:
>> Falmer Press
>> SAUCIER, G., & GOLDBERG, L.R. (1994 in press). The language
>> of personality:
>> Lexical perspectives on the Five-Factor model. In: J.S.
>> Wiggins (Ed.),
>> Theoretical perspectives for the Five-Factor model. New
>> York: Guilford
>> SMITH B.D. (1988), Chapter 20, In: Nesselroade and Cattell
>> eds.: Handbook of
>> multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed.), Plenum
>> Press, NY NY
>> THURSTONE, L.L. (1933), The vectors of the mind,
>> Psychological Review, vol.
>> 41(1), pp. 1-32
>> THURSTONE, L.L. (1947), Multiple-Factor Analysis, Chicago:
>> University of
>> Chicago
>> Press
>> TUPES, E.C., & CRYSTAL, R.E. (1961). Recurrent personality
>> factors based on
>> trait ratings (Tech. Rep. ASD-TR-61-97). Lackland Air Force
>> Base, TX: U.S.
>> Air Force
>> WIGGINS, J.S. (1980). Circumplex models of interpersonal
>> behavior. In: L
>> Wheeler
>> (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 1,
>> pp. 265-294).
>> Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
>> ZUCKERMAN M., KUHLMAN M. & CAMAC C. (1988), What Lies Beyond
>> E and
>> N? Factor
>> Analyses of Scales Believed to Measure Basic Dimensions of
>> Personality,
>> Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 96-107
>> ZUCKERMAN et al. (1991), Five (or Three) Robust
>> Questionnaire Scale Factors of
>> Personality Without Culture, Personality and Individual
>> Differences, Vol. 12,
>> No. 9, 929-942
>> ZUCKERMAN M. (1993), A comparison of three structural models
>> for personality:
>> The Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five.
>> Journal of
>> Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 65, No. 4, pp.
>> 757-768
>>
>
>
>
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!