> God has been proven to exist based upon the most reserved view of the
> known laws of physics. For much more on that, see Prof. Frank J.
> Tipler's below paper, which among other things demonstrates that the
> known laws of physics (i.e., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, general
> relativity, quantum mechanics, and the Standard Model of particle
> physics) require that the universe end in the Omega Point (the final
> cosmological singularity and state of infinite informational capacit

> identified as being God):

>

> state of infinite informational capacity identified as being God

> God has been proven to exist based upon the most reserved view of the
> known laws of physics. For much more on that, see Prof. Frank J.
> Tipler's below paper, which among other things demonstrates that the
> known laws of physics (i.e., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, general
> relativity, quantum mechanics, and the Standard Model of particle
> physics) require that the universe end in the Omega Point (the final
> cosmological singularity and state of infinite informational capacity
> identified as being God):
>
> F. J. Tipler, "The structure of the world from pure numbers," Reports
> on Progress in Physics, Vol. 68, No. 4 (April 2005), pp. 897-964.http://math.tulane.edu/~tipler/theoryofeverything.pdfAlso released as
> "Feynman-Weinberg Quantum Gravity and the Extended Standard Model as a
> Theory of Everything," arXiv:0704.3276, April 24, 2007.http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.3276
>
> Out of 50 articles, Prof. Tipler's above paper was selected as one of
> 12 for the "Highlights of 2005" accolade as "the very best articles
> published in Reports on Progress in Physics in 2005 [Vol. 68].
> Articles were selected by the Editorial Board for their outstanding
> reviews of the field. They all received the highest praise from our ...

> Den 2008-08-05 22:32:31 skrev James Redford yahoo.com>:
>
>
>
> When discussing numbers one must also take into account the "quality"
> of number, not only their abstract properties. M-L von Franz discusses
> such a theory about the primacy of the quality of number in the
> universe. The Pythagoreans, for their part, seemed to have viewed
> numbers as "things", and as such they were the building blocks of the
> universe. It's somewhat similar to Bertrand Russell's logical entities
> of "between", "above" "below". These combine with sense-data to form a
> universe. It seems like Plato in his thinking included the "qualities"
> of entities such as numbers, cups and tables. In Diogenes Laërtius,
> book 6, Plato engages Diogenes the Cynic:
>
> »When Plato was discoursing about his "ideas," and using the nouns
> "tableness " and "cupness ;" "I, O Plato!" interrupted Diogenes, "see
> a table and a cup, but I see no tableness or cupness." Plato made
> answer, "That is natural enough, for you have eyes, by which a cup and ...

> On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:32:31 -0400, James Redford wrote:

>> state of infinite informational capacity identified as being God

>
> Is this identification the same process used to identify something as
> being a dog or snow?
>
> Has god actively declared himself  as such (e.g. "Ok, you found me, I am
> God) or is God, for want of a better idea, a 'logical' conclusion?
>
> If one where to call this 'the proof that Zaktor' exists would this be
> equally valid?
>
> NOTE: Zaktor is an all powerful being who created everything and who gave
> me and a few special friends special and exclusive revelations one of
> which is that all mathematics is a metaphorical circle jerk unless it is
> used for things like carpentry, weighing out bread and knowing when the
> train arrives.
>
> POST NOTE: If he was wrong about any of this, does he still exist? ...