|
|
 Up |
  |
Author: Patriot GamesPatriot Games Date: Jan 19, 2007 07:08
> In the first 8 decades, 43 Cat 3, 4 and 5 hurricanes.
> In the last 8 decades, 49 Cat, 3, 4 and 5 storms.
> All Cat 5 storms were in the past 8 decades.
Are you STILL trying to scare everybody with this inaccurate bullshit?
Everybody who isn't retarded knows global warming is real. You're not a
retard are you?
If you really want scare folks go rent that stupid slide-show movie Al "I
invented the Internet but my own relatives still wouldn't vote for me" Gore
made.
Fast forward to the slide showing how scary-bad this global warming
iteration is. Now, don't listen to Al lying to you. Instead look to the
right of that slide and notice that EVERY KNOWN global warming event on
Earth has resulted in an ICE AGE.
Okay? Get it? Why THE FUCK would I give a shit about the planet warming
WHEN AN ICE IS COMING???
|
| Show full article (1.22Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: Jan 18, 2007 17:18
In the first 8 decades, 43 Cat 3, 4 and 5 hurricanes.
In the last 8 decades, 49 Cat, 3, 4 and 5 storms.
All Cat 5 storms were in the past 8 decades.
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/gifs/table6.gif
Bret Cahill
|
| |
| 50 Comments |
|
|
Author: kTkT Date: Jan 18, 2007 17:21
Bret Cahill wrote:
> In the first 8 decades, 43 Cat 3, 4 and 5 hurricanes.
>
> In the last 8 decades, 49 Cat, 3, 4 and 5 storms.
>
> All Cat 5 storms were in the past 8 decades.
>
> http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/gifs/table6.gif
|
| |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: Hanson wallows in Exxon's Brown TurdsHanson wallows in Exxon's Brown Turds Date: Jan 18, 2007 17:29
Bret Cahill wrote:
> In the first 8 decades, 43 Cat 3, 4 and 5 hurricanes.
>
> In the last 8 decades, 49 Cat, 3, 4 and 5 storms.
>
> All Cat 5 storms were in the past 8 decades.
>
> http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/gifs/table6.gif
>
>
> Bret Cahill
There were 43 PER DECADE, now there were 35 just counting SINCE KATRINA
in 2005.
35 MAJOR Hurricanes category 3, 4 or 5 SINCE Katrina.
Average one every 13 days. 11 super-hurricanes Category-5
|
| Show full article (3.92Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: Jan 18, 2007 17:42
>> In the first 8 decades, 43 Cat 3, 4 and 5 hurricanes.
>
>> In the last 8 decades, 49 Cat, 3, 4 and 5 storms.
>
>> All Cat 5 storms were in the past 8 decades.
>
> You call this data? What are you ... in kindergarten?
Well my students are little kids. Either that or brain damaged.
Bret Cahill
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: Captain CompassionCaptain Compassion Date: Jan 18, 2007 18:16
On 18 Jan 2007 17:18:49 -0800, "Bret Cahill" aol.com>
wrote:
>In the first 8 decades, 43 Cat 3, 4 and 5 hurricanes.
>
>In the last 8 decades, 49 Cat, 3, 4 and 5 storms.
>
>All Cat 5 storms were in the past 8 decades.
>
> http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/gifs/table6.gif
> The Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale didn't come into existence until
1969 and the ability to measure wind speed in many Hurricanes didn't
start until Airplanes could fly into the heart of storms around 1945
so the actual measurement as well as knowledge of many storms prior to
WWII is a matter of conjecture.
|
| Show full article (1.30Kb) |
| 19 Comments |
|
|
Author: tomaxotomaxo Date: Jan 18, 2007 18:39
Captain Compassion wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2007 17:18:49 -0800, "Bret Cahill" aol.com>
> wrote:
>>>In the first 8 decades, 43 Cat 3, 4 and 5 hurricanes.
>>
>>In the last 8 decades, 49 Cat, 3, 4 and 5 storms.
>>
>>All Cat 5 storms were in the past 8 decades.
>>
>> http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/gifs/table6.gif
>> > The Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale didn't come into existence until
> 1969 and the ability to measure wind speed in many Hurricanes didn't
> start until Airplanes could fly into the heart of storms around 1945
> so the actual measurement as well as knowledge of many storms prior to
> WWII is a matter of conjecture.
|
| Show full article (1.96Kb) |
| 6 Comments |
|
|
Author: Hanson wallows in Exxon's Brown TurdsHanson wallows in Exxon's Brown Turds Date: Jan 18, 2007 19:04
Captain Compassion wrote:
> The Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale didn't come into existence until
> 1969 and the ability to measure wind speed in many Hurricanes didn't
> start until Airplanes could fly into the heart of storms around 1945
> so the actual measurement as well as knowledge of many storms prior to
> WWII is a matter of conjecture.
The barometer is the final decisive instrument, over-ruling every
alternative measure. Barometers have existed with the same accuracy as
today's barometers for the entire history of hurricane records of 160
years. There are some barometer records going back to the 1870s.
Nobody makes a mistake between a category 5 and a category 1.
You know if it was a MAJOR HURRICANE or not.
Who has more money for science research, EXXON or YOU? Who has more
than 12,000 patents filed by staff scientists, EXXON or YOU. When they
say CO2 causes Global Warming Climate Change, you shut your dicksucking
mouth and accept it.
|
| Show full article (6.64Kb) |
| 11 Comments |
|
|
Author: PubliusPublius Date: Jan 18, 2007 19:22
>>>In the first 8 decades, 43 Cat 3, 4 and 5 hurricanes.
>>>
>>>In the last 8 decades, 49 Cat, 3, 4 and 5 storms.
>>>
>>>All Cat 5 storms were in the past 8 decades.
>>>
>>> http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/gifs/table6.gif>> The Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale didn't come into existence until
>> 1969 and the ability to measure wind speed in many Hurricanes didn't
>> start until Airplanes could fly into the heart of storms around 1945
>> so the actual measurement as well as knowledge of many storms prior to
>> WWII is a matter of conjecture.
> I agree with your point regarding the flawed methodology of comparing
> hurricanes categorized based on current, measured statistics (wind
> speed, etc.) with hurricanes categorized using assumptions based on
> unscientific historical accounts and statistical analysis of evidence
> collected long after the event.
|
| Show full article (1.51Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: PubliusPublius Date: Jan 18, 2007 19:35
> WASHINGTON, DC, Jan. 3-A new report from the Union of Concerned
> Scientists offers the most comprehensive documentation to date of how
> ExxonMobil has adopted the tobacco industry's disinformation tactics,
> [ . . .]
That is what is called an *ad hominem* argument ("Don't believe Smith because
Smith was funded by ExxonMobil").
If you are going to crosspost to alt.phil, you should ditch the fallacies and
stick to the arguments.
|
| |
| 10 Comments |
|
|
|
|
