|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: John JonesJohn Jones Date: Mar 8, 2008 08:40
To walk hand in hand with our destroyers is the goal of the race and
species improvers.
I don't want to be misunderstood. I am not saying that improvement might
'lead' to destruction of who we are, I am saying that the programme of
genetic advancement is grounded on our destruction.
|
| |
|
| | 14 Comments |
|
|
Author: EdEd Date: Mar 8, 2008 10:43
On Mar 8, 11:40 am, John Jones aol.com> wrote:> To walk hand in hand with our destroyers is the goal of the race and
> species improvers.
>
> I don't want to be misunderstood. I am not saying that improvement might
> 'lead' to destruction of who we are, I am saying that the programme of
> genetic advancement is grounded on our destruction.
I agree totally!
When a phoenix is born the old phoenix is utterly destroyed.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: NicNic Date: Mar 8, 2008 12:50
On 8 Mar, 18:43, Ed earthlink.net> wrote:
> I agree totally!
> When a phoenix is born the old phoenix is utterly destroyed.
so it is obvious someone will rebuild on California?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Day BrownDay Brown Date: Mar 8, 2008 15:23
Its not upta us. Smart white carreer women, seeing that the men of
their station are already married to sexy younger bimbos, are going to
fertility clinics to select from among thousands of more promising
lines of the Y chromosome than resides in the balls of the posters
here.
The women are already in management, and will be bringing their girls
in as they mature. Which will make the general level of the staff even
more competent and smarter. And more successful in the free market.
The money will follow them, and seeing the result, they will get more
money to even use nannies to carry the next generation of Uberwench in
their wombs using in vitro.
No way to stop this in a free market capitalist system.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: NicNic Date: Mar 10, 2008 04:00
>On 8 Mar, 23:23, Day Brown hughes.net> wrote:
You know I'd have to consider that the it is frequently
more commonly true in that tradition says that a man is to take a
wife and her object is to reproduce, she/he can also appear to
become isolated and dehumanised without care and love of a support
system. A large part of child care obviously demands both parents
family and friends.
The only way some people will always see her, (in disheartenment
she will see herself), is as a machine. It could seem very obvious
that the only ways others see to prevent her 'being taken advantage
of' (in childbearing ...which is NOT against the law) is to prevent
her from having a normal and natural liasons, in seeing see that
she never has children
So to take a woman alone for the purpose to have kids
and to use her and then neglect her is to prevent happy
marriages.....even tho theirs was fleetingly complete and
happy at the time of the conceptions
|
| Show full article (3.52Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Day BrownDay Brown Date: Mar 10, 2008 10:54
Another huge problem for monogamy, that while it looks good in
practice, it fails to recognize where we came from. Which is to say
small communities with elders and witches who raisied the children of
incompetent parents in order to maximize genetic diversity in small
gene pools. The kid mite grow up to be a stupid jerk, but still have
the DNA markers for effective immune system response to dysentery,
malaria, cholera, et al.
What we are talking about is a case management problem. And the
problem has gotten dramatically worse since birth control came in, and
the women who do case management reduced their fecundity, while the
client classes did not. This has gone on now for 2-3 generations, and
the iteration has resulted in case loads going thru the roof.
|
| Show full article (1.35Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: NicNic Date: Mar 11, 2008 05:06
On 10 Mar, 17:54, Day Brown hughes.net> wrote:> Another huge problem for monogamy, that while it looks good in
> practice, it fails to recognize where we came from. Which is to say
> small communities with elders and witches who raisied the children of
> incompetent parents in order to maximize genetic diversity in small
> gene pools. The kid mite grow up to be a stupid jerk, but still have
> the DNA markers for effective immune system response to dysentery,
> malaria, cholera, et al.
>
> What we are talking about is a case management problem. And the
> problem has gotten dramatically worse since birth control came in, and
> the women who do case management reduced their fecundity, while the
> client classes did not. This has gone on now for 2-3 generations, and
> the iteration has resulted in case loads going thru the roof.
>
> If you truly want to see the dispossessed given the opportunity you
> think they need, then you need to supply them with the competent
> teachers, case workers, midwives, nurses, and system administrators.
> And much of the talent to peform in these fields is written on the
> mtDNA. We will either see an Uberwench genetics program to ...
|
| Show full article (6.02Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Day BrownDay Brown Date: Mar 11, 2008 20:44
One way or the other, we will have eugenics. The world cannot support
6 billion crazy stupid people. They are gullible enough to support
demagogues, whose policies will lead to ecological disaster, financial
panic, economic collapse, and then global famine. Only the fit will
survive.
Or- we can engage in a deliberate effort to reduce the numbers of
client classes by having their women give birth to kids with better
genetic endowment thru careful Y chromosome selection and/or in vitro
fertilization of selected eggs. I dunno that there is time left for
this method. But either way, smart successful career women are already
going to fertility clinics trying to ensure that their children will
be more talented and better able to compete in the global job market.
|
| Show full article (1.58Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: NicNic Date: Mar 15, 2008 16:16
On 12 Mar, 03:44, Day Brown hughes.net> wrote:
'Only the fit will survive'eh?
actually, I think 'the fit' are frequently prevented
from survival, we send them off to slay others in
rediculous wars, ruin a generation of fit and healthy
so the meek can inherit through divorce.
Women can't fight like 'that' ever...but they do & can use
alternative therapy.
I think we take it for granted that all women should have
the self same inaliable rights to all issues, regards subjects
on their birth gender. If a woman chooses not to exercise
her birth right to use that gender,ie to at least 'try' to have
children, all rights must be revoked....unless of course she
has been sorely beaten and distracted in anyway to stop
her from having a child (with whomsoever she choose)
|
| Show full article (1.18Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Day BrownDay Brown Date: Mar 15, 2008 20:01
On Mar 15, 6:16 pm, Nic hotmail.co.uk> wrote:> I hate the idea of eugenics, I think that everyone has unique
> qualities about them,
I dont worry about it, its not upta me, and there's no reason for
women who make the decision, to ask my opinion.
But you know that for years Dr. Laura has been saying:"Well you picked
him honey." And now, young women are looking at the pickings, and
those who are smart enuf to make the money to affort it, are going to
fertility clinics to select from only the most promising Y chromosome
lines.
And whether we like it or not, The transnationals will see that if
they can get their talented women to do the same, then those kids will
be good bets to enter the firm at adulthood. Which everyone expects
will be very good for profits. Men, when they ran businesses, always
brouht their sons along. Why would we think women would do less for
their daughters?
I grant that the vast majority of women are stupid emotional bitches.
But the competition will be obvious to everyone as these talented kids
from the fertility clinics grow up.
|
| Show full article (2.39Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
