|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: George HammondGeorge Hammond Date: Apr 3, 2008 05:59
Definition:
GAP
(General Anthropic Principle)
Existence is a property of Human perception.
Absent a human observer, reality, the laws
of Physics, the Universe itself, do not "exist".
Proof:
If all humans expired at 9 am tomorrow,
there would be no way to confirm, even in
principle, that the Universe "exists".
QED: The Universe is "created" BY (e.g.
is a property of) human perception.
(Note: The SAP (special Anthropic Principle)
has now been universally accepted by the scientific
community as being correct, Stephen Hawking
cites it 15 times in his _Brief History of Time_
for instance.)
GAP and the PROOF OF GOD
It turns out that there is a fundamental and
universal defect in human perception (GAP DEFECT)
caused by incomplete growth (children are an obvious
example), but in...
|
| Show full article (1.75Kb) |
|
| | 95 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Don StockbauerDon Stockbauer Date: Apr 3, 2008 06:50
On Apr 3, 7:59 am, George Hammond notspam.org> wrote:
> Definition:
> GAP
> (General Anthropic Principle)
> Existence is a property of Human perception.
> Absent a human observer, reality, the laws
> of Physics, the Universe itself, do not "exist".
>
> Proof:
> If all humans expired at 9 am tomorrow,
> there would be no way to confirm, even in
> principle, that the Universe "exists".
> QED: The Universe is "created" BY (e.g.
> is a property of) human perception.
>
> (Note: The SAP (special Anthropic Principle)
> has now been universally accepted by the scientific
> community as being correct, Stephen Hawking
> cites it 15 times in his _Brief History of Time_
> for instance.) ...
|
| Show full article (2.17Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: ErrolErrol Date: Apr 3, 2008 07:34
On Apr 3, 2:59Â pm, George Hammond notspam.org> wrote:
> Definition:
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â GAP
> Â Â (General Anthropic Principle)
> Existence is a property of Human perception.
> Absent a human observer, reality, the laws
> of Physics, the Universe itself, do not "exist".
>
> Proof:
> Â Â If all humans expired at 9 am tomorrow,
> there would be no way to confirm, even in
> principle, that the Universe "exists".
> Â Â QED: Â The Universe is "created" BY (e.g.
> is a property of) human perception.
>
I thought you believed in god? By your own reckoning, all the people
who have died and are floating on little clouds playing the harp in
heaven could just look down and say "Hey there's the Earth, it
survived our demise, therefore the GAP is false."
|
| Show full article (0.96Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: George HammondGeorge Hammond Date: Apr 3, 2008 08:43
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 07:34:13 -0700 (PDT), Errol
gmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 3, 2:59Â pm, George Hammond notspam.org> wrote:
>> Definition:
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â GAP
>> Â Â (General Anthropic Principle)
>> Existence is a property of Human perception.
>> Absent...
|
| Show full article (0.95Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Uncle AlUncle Al Date: Apr 3, 2008 12:10
George Hammond wrote:
>
> Definition:
> GAP
> (General Anthropic Principle)
> Existence is a property of Human perception.
[snip shit]
Tell it to an unseen supernova, unseen galaxies, interstellar
hydrogen, dark matter, magnetic fields, etc.
Idiot.
> WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD:
> =====================================
[snip rest of shit]
Hey stooopid, Hindus have 36 crores of gods - 360 million deities.
How is India doing? Post a list of all Hindu deities that do not
qualify as God, and why.
Can God make a collection plate so vast that even He cannot fill it?
Sure! ALL OF THEM.
|
| Show full article (0.92Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: George HammondGeorge Hammond Date: Apr 3, 2008 13:32
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:10:56 -0800, Uncle Al
hate.spam.net> wrote:
>George Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Definition:
>> GAP
>> (General Anthropic Principle)
>> Existence is a property of Human perception.
>[snip shit]
>
>Tell it to an unseen supernova...
|
| Show full article (2.29Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Richard TobinRichard Tobin Date: Apr 3, 2008 13:39
KCS = KOOK CAPITALS SYNDROME
-- Richard
--
:wq
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: George HammondGeorge Hammond Date: Apr 3, 2008 17:36
>KCS = KOOK CAPITALS SYNDROME
>
>-- Richard
>
I'm upper case jackass.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Don StockbauerDon Stockbauer Date: Apr 3, 2008 19:01
On Apr 3, 7:36 pm, George Hammond notspam.org> wrote:
> On 3 Apr 2008 20:39:35 GMT, rich...@ cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard
>
> Tobin) wrote:
>>KCS = KOOK CAPITALS SYNDROME
>
>>-- Richard
>
> I'm upper case jackass.
Boy, that sitcom "Hazel" was really good.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: George HammondGeorge Hammond Date: Apr 3, 2008 19:56
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:01:34 -0700 (PDT), Don Stockbauer
hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 3, 7:36 pm, George Hammond notspam.org> wrote:
>> On 3 Apr 2008 20:39:35 GMT, rich...@ cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard
>>
>> Tobin) wrote:
>>>KCS = KOOK CAPITALS SYNDROME
>>
>>>-- Richard
>>
>> I'm upper case jackass.
>
>Boy, that sitcom "Hazel" was really good.
>
>
Pleasure to hear a stooge like you go cutsie.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|