"Furrows Cannot Be Concentric Circles or Spirals"
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
"Furrows Cannot Be Concentric Circles or Spirals"         


Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Jul 21, 2008 12:35

What idiot suggested this?

And _no_ you cannot key word search to identify the moron.

We're on the honor system.

Bret Cahill
39 Comments
Re: "Furrows Cannot Be Concentric Circles or Spirals"         


Author: John Fields
Date: Jul 21, 2008 13:21

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:35:31 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
aol.com> wrote:
>What idiot suggested this?
>
>And _no_ you cannot key word search to identify the moron.

---
Seems the idiot posted:

"Another option is to eliminate the tractor altogether and drag the
plow and other impliments off of a "super pivot," the common "crop
circle" irrigation structure beefed up for the heavier load.

The impliments would move inward for a spiral furrow."

And posted from:

7312809d-2aad-4466-8d33-6664b2244cdd@c2g2000pra.googlegroups.com

Which makes perfect sense since most of the shit seems to come from
Google Groupers these days.
---
>We're on the honor system.

---
Fuck you, wanker.
Show full article (0.79Kb)
1 Comment
Re: "Furrows Cannot Be Concentric Circles or Spirals"         


Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Jul 21, 2008 21:47

>>What idiot suggested this?
>
>>And _no_ you cannot key word search to identify the moron.
>
> ---
> Seems the idiot posted:
> "Another option is to eliminate the tractor altogether and drag the
> plow and other impliments off of a "super pivot," the common "crop
> circle" irrigation structure beefed up for the heavier load.
>
> The impliments would move inward for a spiral furrow."

What doesn't sound reasaonable?

Anyway, all this dodges the issue:

What idiot suggested that furrows cannot be circular or spiral?

Bret Cahill
no comments
Re: "Furrows Cannot Be Concentric Circles or Spirals"         


Author: John Fields
Date: Jul 22, 2008 02:09

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:47:49 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
aol.com> wrote:
>>>What idiot suggested this?
>>
>>>And _no_ you cannot key word search to identify the moron.
>>
>> ---
>> Seems the idiot posted:
>
>> "Another option is to eliminate the tractor altogether and drag the
>> plow and other impliments off of a "super pivot," the common "crop
>> circle" irrigation structure beefed up for the heavier load.
>>
>> The impliments would move inward for a spiral furrow."
>
>What doesn't sound reasaonable?

---
Inward?
---
Show full article (0.80Kb)
no comments
Re: "Furrows Cannot Be Concentric Circles or Spirals"         


Author: BretCahill
Date: Jul 22, 2008 07:13

>>>>What idiot suggested this?
>
>>>>And _no_ you cannot key word search to identify the moron.
>
>>> ---
>>> Seems the idiot posted:
>
>>> "Another option is to eliminate the tractor altogether and drag the
>>> plow and other impliments off of a "super pivot," the common "crop
>>> circle" irrigation structure beefed up for the heavier load.
>
>>> The impliments would move inward for a spiral furrow."
>
>>What doesn't sound reasaonable?
>
> ---
> Inward?

Or outward.

The plow moves in a + or - radial direction as the pivot turns.
Show full article (1.29Kb)
no comments
Re: "Furrows Cannot Be Concentric Circles or Spirals"         


Author: John Fields
Date: Jul 22, 2008 09:23

On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:13:14 -0700 (PDT), BretCahill@peoplepc.com
wrote:
Show full article (1.90Kb)
no comments
Re: "Furrows Cannot Be Concentric Circles or Spirals"         


Author: Michael A. Terrell
Date: Jul 22, 2008 09:46

John Fields wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:13:14 -0700 (PDT), BretCahill@peoplepc.com
> wrote:
>
>>>>>>What idiot suggested this?
>>>
>>>>>>And _no_ you cannot key word search to identify the moron.
>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Seems the idiot posted:
>>>
>>>>> "Another option is to eliminate the tractor altogether and drag the
>>>>> plow and other impliments off of a "super pivot," the common "crop
>>>>> circle" irrigation structure beefed up for the heavier load.
>>>
>>>>> The impliments would move inward for a spiral furrow."
>>>
>>>>What doesn't sound reasaonable?
>>> ...
Show full article (2.39Kb)
no comments
Re: "Furrows Cannot Be Concentric Circles or Spirals"         


Author: BretCahill
Date: Jul 22, 2008 10:51

>>>>>>What idiot suggested this?
>
>>>>>>And _no_ you cannot key word search to identify the moron.
>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Seems the idiot posted:
>
>>>>> "Another option is to eliminate the tractor altogether and drag the
>>>>> plow and other impliments off of a "super pivot," the common "crop
>>>>> circle" irrigation structure beefed up for the heavier load.
>
>>>>> The impliments would move inward for a spiral furrow."
>
>>>>What doesn't sound reasaonable?
>
>>> ---
>>> Inward?
>
>>Or outward.
> ...
Show full article (2.46Kb)
no comments
Re: "Furrows Cannot Be Concentric Circles or Spirals"         


Author: Tim
Date: Jul 22, 2008 11:16

peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:0e0e2462-d1c8-404c-8823-7bb768c6828a@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>What idiot suggested this?
>
>>>>>>And _no_ you cannot key word search to identify the moron.
>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Seems the idiot posted:
>
>>>>> "Another option is to eliminate the tractor altogether and drag the
>>>>> plow and other impliments off of a "super pivot," the common "crop
>>>>> circle" irrigation structure beefed up for the heavier load.
>
>>>>> The impliments would move inward for a spiral furrow."
>
>>>>What doesn't sound reasaonable?
>
>>> ---
>>> Inward?
> ...
Show full article (2.97Kb)
no comments
Re: "Furrows Cannot Be Concentric Circles or Spirals"         


Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Jul 22, 2008 11:53

>>>>>>>What idiot suggested this?
>
>>>>>>>And _no_ you cannot key word search to identify the moron.
>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Seems the idiot posted:
>
>>>>>> "Another option is to eliminate the tractor altogether and drag the
>>>>>> plow and other impliments off of a "super pivot," the common "crop
>>>>>> circle" irrigation structure beefed up for the heavier load.
>
>>>>>> The impliments would move inward for a spiral furrow."
>
>>>>>What doesn't sound reasaonable?
>
>>>> ---
>>>> Inward?
>
>>>Or outward.
> ...
Show full article (2.28Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4