BY HARUN YAHYA

The questions of how the universe originated, where it leads to, and
how the laws maintaining its order and balance work have always been
topics of interest. Scientists and thinkers have thought about this
subject endlessly and have produced quite a few theories.

The prevailing thought until the early 20th century was that the
universe had infinite dimensions, that it had existed since eternity,
and that it would continue to exist forever. According to this view,
called the ‘static universe model’, the universe had neither a
beginning nor an end.
Laying the groundwork for the materialist philosophy, this view denied
the existence of a Creator while it maintained that the universe is a
constant, stable, and unchanging collection of matter.

Materialism is a system of thought that holds matter to be an absolute
being and denies the existence of anything but matter. Having its
roots in ancient Greece and gaining ever-increasing acceptance in the
19th century, this system of thought became famous in the shape of the
dialectical materialism of Karl Marx.

Story time.

On Aug 23, 1:36 am, Hamady gmail.com> wrote:

On Aug 23, 1:51 am, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:

Sure, but AL and Ed had some stimulating material to develop, while
learning about the stroy teller.

BOfL

On Aug 22, 6:36 pm, Hamady gmail.com> wrote:

====================================================.

FROM NON-BEING TO BEING.
FROM NOTHINGNESS TO NOT-NOTHINGNESS.
FROM VACUUM TO EARTH LIFE.
========.

I want to explain my position briefly.
There are only two Absolute constants in Universe:
T=0K and c=1.
And I explain the Existence using only these two
Absolute constants.

THE GENESIS.
1.
T = 0K.
There is only one Absolute Reference Frame
and it is Vacuum : T=0K .
And Quantum Theory says that T=0K is not dead space.
2.
QT says the " virtual particles " exist in Vacuum...

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:36:35 -0700, Hamady wrote:

The thought that "instantly arises" 'instantly arose' at humanity's dawn.

A bird is also a thought that "instantly arises". A feather found on the
ground gives evidence that a bird must be involved.

"Super" natural evidence is taken to mean a super natural Agent must be
involved. Unlike the bird however, which is a natural agent, a
supernatural thing is not natural but why is it explained using the
natural world (e.g. the atom), like a bird's feather that gives evidence
of a bird?

SuperNatural here means, that which is natural but also that which is so
"super" in complexity and scope as to be beyond material understanding
yet material design is given as evidence.