|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: C3C3 Date: Jun 19, 2008 23:35
How can you talk about someone or something if it does not exist? Do
words need a referrent? It's like saying, what's a widget? So do
fictional characters like Romeo and Juliet, Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde,
Annakin Skywalker exist in some philosophical universe of creation?
C3
|
| |
|
| | 10 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Sir FrederickSir Frederick Date: Jun 20, 2008 00:11
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:35:44 -0700 (PDT), C3 aol.com> wrote:
>How can you talk about someone or something if it does not exist? Do
>words need a referrent? It's like saying, what's a widget? So do
>fictional characters like Romeo and Juliet, Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde,
>Annakin Skywalker exist in some philosophical universe of creation?
>
>C3
As information structures we represent the situation through
a personal brain based "virtual reality" (model):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_reality
Thus "fiction" is a marginal issue.
There may be structures in the brain perhaps called
"credibility module". When functioning properly this may
evaluate "model" aspects as to their "credibility" or
"reality". Of course this "credibility" function is subject
to its own "credibility" and can even be aberrational, as in
some here.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mark EarnestMark Earnest Date: Jun 20, 2008 00:45
> How can you talk about someone or something if it does not exist? Do
> words need a referrent? It's like saying, what's a widget? So do
> fictional characters like Romeo and Juliet, Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde,
> Annakin Skywalker exist in some philosophical universe of creation?
Yes.
They all exist.
Everything that is conceivable by man is true somewhere, somehow.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: C3C3 Date: Jun 20, 2008 00:54
On Jun 20, 12:45�am, "Mark Earnest" yahoo.com> wrote:
>> How can you talk about someone or something if it does not exist? �Do
>> words need a referrent? It's like saying, what's a widget? So do
>> fictional characters like Romeo and Juliet, Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde,
>> Annakin Skywalker �exist in some philosophical universe of creation?
>
> Yes.
> They all exist.
> Everything that is conceivable by man is true somewhere, somehow.
That is a radical notion which I sometimes wonder about. Do these
"fictional" characters have volition and free will?
C3
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mark EarnestMark Earnest Date: Jun 20, 2008 01:17
"C3" aol.com> wrote in message
news:384ae1c4-e736-45a2-974c-2dc2cbc6debc@g16g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 20, 12:45?am, "Mark Earnest" yahoo.com> wrote:
>> How can you talk about someone or something if it does not exist? ?Do
>> words need a referrent? It's like saying, what's a widget? So do
>> fictional characters like Romeo and Juliet, Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde,
>> Annakin Skywalker ?exist in some philosophical universe of creation?
>
> Yes.
> They all exist.
> Everything that is conceivable by man is true somewhere, somehow.
That is a radical notion which I sometimes wonder about. Do these
"fictional" characters have volition and free will?
|
| Show full article (0.94Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Jun 20, 2008 03:26
On Jun 20, 4:35 pm, C3 aol.com> wrote:
> How can you talk about someone or something if it does not exist? Do
> words need a referrent? It's like saying, what's a widget? So do
> fictional characters like Romeo and Juliet, Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde,
> Annakin Skywalker exist in some philosophical universe of creation?
>
> C3
I remember many years ago, putting a similar question to a sci fi
panel on a radio show.
The question being "if imagination is part of creation, is it possible
to imagine something outside of creation". There was deadly silence, a
few grunts and the comment "NEXT". Very confirming.
There is a scene from the great movie, "Contact" where the answer is
delivered beautifully, and also in Robin Williams's "Where Dreams Come
From."
Ther is no limit to what an individual creates. What would you expect
on the Shakesperian 'world stage'.
Just thought of a funny line. If all the world is a stage, and we are
merely players, should we all have to belong to actors equity :-).
|
| Show full article (1.02Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Jun 20, 2008 03:30
On Jun 20, 5:54 pm, C3 aol.com> wrote:
> On Jun 20, 12:45�am, "Mark Earnest" yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> "C3" aol.com> wrote in message
>
>
>>> How can you talk about someone or something if it does not exist? �Do
>>> words need a referrent? It's like saying, what's a widget? So do
>>> fictional characters like Romeo and Juliet, Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde,
>>> Annakin Skywalker �exist in some philosophical universe of creation?
>
>> Yes.
>> They all exist.
>> Everything that is conceivable by man is true somewhere, somehow.
>
> That is a radical notion which I sometimes wonder about. Do these
> "fictional" characters have volition and free will?
>
> C3 ...
|
| Show full article (1.14Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Jun 20, 2008 03:32
On Jun 20, 6:17 pm, "Mark Earnest" yahoo.com> wrote:
> "C3" aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:384ae1c4-e736-45a2-974c-2dc2cbc6debc@g16g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 20, 12:45?am, "Mark Earnest" yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> "C3" aol.com> wrote in message
>
>
>>> How can you talk about someone or something if it does not exist? ?Do
>>> words need a referrent? It's like saying, what's a widget? So do
>>> fictional characters like Romeo and Juliet, Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde,
>>> Annakin Skywalker ?exist in some philosophical universe of creation?
>
>> Yes.
>> They all exist.
>> Everything that is conceivable by man is true somewhere, somehow.
>
> That is a radical notion which I sometimes wonder about. Do these ...
|
| Show full article (1.16Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: ZerkonXZerkonX Date: Jun 20, 2008 04:14
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:35:44 -0700, C3 wrote:
> philosophical universe of creation?
metaphors.
John runs like a deer is a simile
John is a deer = metaphor for john who can run fast
A deer, when put into a plot, could be a metaphor for a certain kind of
people or all people. Bambi = the innocent
It can work the other way also where characters become metaphors for
ideals or concepts.
Jeckyl and Hyde is a metaphor for the good/bad nature in all humans.
Romeo and Juliet = young love.
The One Ring = Absolute Power
The Matrix = Engineered Reality
The list goes on and on and into holy books, the ancient ballads, most if
not all works of literature, movies, plays and song. So deep in the
psyche of the human species that it is nearly impossible to always tell
the deer from John.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: ErrolErrol Date: Jun 20, 2008 05:35
On Jun 20, 8:35 am, C3 aol.com> wrote:
> How can you talk about someone or something if it does not exist? Do
> words need a referrent? It's like saying, what's a widget? So do
> fictional characters like Romeo and Juliet, Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde,
> Annakin Skywalker exist in some philosophical universe of creation?
>
> C3
Read Jasper FFordes' "Lost in a good book" or "The well of lost plots"
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|