|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
| Re: Feminism is a male hypocracy |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: NicNic Date: Sep 12, 2008 13:09
On 11 Sep, 23:15, Topaz hotmail.com> wrote:
I read thru a lot of that, and it doesnt sound much more than
a pep talk by most goverments for some kind of pro life
campaign.....however, it was the destruction caused by
the eugenisists and elitist government that I know will always
be on our minds and unforgiven, as is the duty call of most soldiers
(count the millions of would be grandpa's and great great grandfathers
and mothers across Europe today if they hadn't been shot at maimed or
eradicated from the gene pools of allied forces across our worlds)
Anti-abortion solves the right to evolve naturally, as nature in time
unfolds
normally quite well without deliberate and preconsidered destruction
of life potential, anyone who willingly and or any other way prevents
the freedom and rights of any other individual to maintain a quality
of life, self respect and freedom to concieve children naturally
is and always will be, to my way of thinking, acting on the fantasy
of under another controlling dictatorate, or how would it be ?
some kind of Nazi opertive!. I'm thinking anyone who PURPOSEFULLY
DAMAGES or DENIES a normal and natural relationship blossom
into family and friends, or has denied the fact that people will fall
in love
on any other day (with or without inhibition for the basic humble need
to love and let love) or obstructs in any way normal family reasonably
evolve and reproducton unfold, is quite obviously
not quite right in the own human evolutional reasoning.
The idea of abortion for pleasure, ie for aesthetics is a basic
and fundamental understated reference to eugenics practices.
for instance, fashion once dictated that where in some parts of
the world beautiful people should have long slender sculls,
other places had differing ideals, would either have miscarried or
caused an abortion becuase they thought that those born with
a rounder, more squat proportioned face would be less than life
will or could ever tolerate? The cult of eugenics and abortion, of
nazi warfare, or of some other discrimination about lesser rungs
on a genetic heirarchical ladder is contrary to my thinking and
belief about how humans evolved, and I think forced marriage
would be also (although it is my belief under observation that
happier families are generally ones where parents and relatives
all have one or several things in common!)
I really do think its becoming very important to consider how
precious life has become, and what genetic research is doing,
selective genes ar'nt the only ones that are precious, all of us
are precious.
It is not a womans right, it is her inclination to concieve when
she feels it is a good time to do so, why do we to interfer with that?
while some women concieve more easily than others and have more
and more opportunity open to them, If she is at risk of being raped,
or who has an occupation accepting his pleasures for money she
may take a contraceptive to prevent miscarriage and conception,
also as she may be so poor she is beyond the pity of her family and
community to support her with another infant child. Of course in
the sophisticated welfare and Western Christian communities women
can have children and be certain that they will be supported by almost
everybody, can't they! after all this is what our greatgrandparents
fought
for and won for isnt that so? and this is why the Western way of life
has
become celebrated with lesbians to worship !
I think that most men are gentle and kind enough in mi experiences
and will not take advantages without her request or consent for it,
and we are not at war so women are not exactly ambushed and raped
by an unfamilliar foreigner or weirdo's who would leave her a maimed
lifeless corpse or destitute with babies. Men do say no! quite
positively
when asked, which is why I ask early!, and I will say no as well
tho...
Free use of contraceptives and abortion on demand has lowered the
respect of individuals for their own personal safety, their self
respect, their
natural inhibition, their human natural inclination to concieve in a
very
special and private way, their respect for other people, and other
peoples
emotional affiliations. Its also lowers the respect for the child if
the woman
concieves the act is more precious to that gift of life, being reduced
in
equality for the few tawdries, lies, or what-have-you's he offers for
his
courage.
but again...this somehow isnt proof to our goverment that everyone
in their country is good enough to have live births and is a risk to
everyone in the neighbourhood, their dogs cats and their property
if they so much as date without conceited and gross interference
and invasion of personal lives and privacy, and a prolonged,improper
and exacerbated enquiry into their reasons for desiring to extend ones
family and circle of mates. and the people who would do such a thing
are in all intent and purpose the filth that should have been cleared
up
after the Great wars in Europe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
