Re: Feminism is a male hypocracy
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Feminism is a male hypocracy         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Nic
Date: Sep 6, 2008 16:13

On 6 Sep, 00:33, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 5, 3:58 pm, Nic hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> cuz it meanz they get sex 4 free if shez on the pill
>
> The Big Irony: Why Modern Men Are Fooled
>
> So men like women who look like blonde bombshells, or Barbie, and
> women want to look like them, because each of their key features
> (youth, long hair, small waist, large breasts, blonde hair, and blue
> eyes) is an indicator of youth and thus of health, reproductive value,
> and fertility. There is precise evolutionary logic behind the image of
> ideal female beauty. By now, astute readers may have caught on to the
> irony of it all. None of what we have said above is true any longer.
> Through face-lifts, wigs, liposuction, surgical breast augmentation,
> hair dye, and color contact lenses, any woman-regardless of age—can
> have many of the key features that define the ideal female beauty.
> Very little of Pamela Anderson's appearance is natural. A 40-year-old
> woman today can rely on modern technology to continue to look like a
> 20-year-old woman. Farrah Fawcett at 60 looks better than most
> "normal" women half her age.
>
> And men fall for them. As the Savanna Principle suggests, their brains
> cannot really comprehend silicone breasts or blonde hair dye, because
> these things did not exist in the ancestral environment ten thousand
> years ago. Men can cognitively understand that many blonde women with
> firm large breasts are not actually 15 years old, but they still find
> them attractive because their evolved psychological mechanisms are
> fooled by the modern inventions that did not exist in the ancestral
> environment.
>
> Why Beautiful People Have More Daughters
> From Dating, Shopping, and Praying to Going to War and Becoming a
> Billionaire-Two Evolutionary Psychologists Explain Why We Do What We
> Do.
> by Alan S. Miller (Author), Satoshi Kanazawahttp://www.amazon.com/Beautiful-People-Have-More-Daughters/dp/0399533656
>
> The Savanna Principle is a theory about the evolutionary roots of the
> human brain. ...it asserts that the environment that molded the human
> brain through natural selection is drastically different than the
> world humans currently live in. This disparity between what man was
> designed to do and what he currently can do leads to a host of
> societal difficulties, according to the theory. For example, ancestors
> who craved sugary and fatty foods lived longer and were healthier than
> those who didn't, in a time that such things were relatively scarce.
> Today, the abundance of such temptations leads to obesity and heart
> disease.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savanna_principle

I wonder if men have the chromosome to give them
the rest of the story, right? when a man says he can't
understand women, he is, biologically, correct.

I don't think all men go by what the research suggests,
age and private experiences account for much more
than a promotional gloss across a selected band in
a broad area in choice.

What women find interesting and fascinating about men
is a different matter....there are certain plain and appealling
body features I find and other freinds found attractive about
men, but that did'nt (and has'nt) found them more attractive
as POTENTIAL PARENTS ie. in real life and I wouldnt have
even considered dating and 'going all the way' with,
considering women are taking a risk as long term evolution,
or, I guess, as nature intends.

....but we can all pretend to love can't we, and the natural
balance between healthy conception, and forced liasion
or forced industry, warps all research and data about
current trend and behavioural practice, I'd say.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!