Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Jul 25, 2008 23:01
On Jul 26, 3:39Â pm, Publius nospam.comcast.net> wrote:SNIP
>
> He sure doesn't, though his opportunties are still considerable. But
> where do you propose to place the blame --- on that single parent, who
> has brought a child into the world whom she is unprepared to provide
> for, or upon others who had no say in the matter and have never had
> contact with either the parent or the child? Or is there another of
> these hypothetical causal chains at work here?
Until one dicovers the actality of reincarnation, then nothing makes
sense. When you do, everything does, even such statements as "as ye
sow, also shall ye reap" and "the sins of the fathers will be
revisired etc". are no longer contradictory. The 'eye for an eye'
takes on a whole new meaning, and tallys with 'evey action has an
equal and opposite reaction".
Understanding such realities, is not 'religious' in nature, no more
than the understanding of Newtons laws is.
If it is knowable, why doesnt every body know?
For the same reason some need to be told 'thou shalt not kill etc',
because they havnt developed the awareness that goes with the
responsibility of their actions. It takes many lives to graduate.
BOfL
.
| 
