The Kantian argument is that the only means of reasoning available to
man is his eyes.

According to Kantian chazzz, "What he's looking at is different to
what he's seeing" hence. according to him, why there's arguments as to
what's real and not real.

All other senses, e.g. his hands nose skin ears and man's ability to
perform millions of different experiments, to poke and prod break and
mend - compare and checking and rechecking, identifying and
eliminating any and all contradiction, play no part in Kantian
reasoning.

Even Kantian Mortal wants people to accept the dopey idea of "eye
alone reasoning" based on a handful of meaningless useless one
dimensional drawings he's found on the web.

Kantian chazzzzz reckons that because some dopey twat many years ago
didn't bother to check the sun's relationship to other stars and
totally fucked up etc, then that somhow means that what man is seeing
today and what man is looking at are somehow different.

On Apr 12, 7:02 pm, Michael Gordge xtra.co.nz> wrote:

SENSATION [B147] "Things in space and time are given only in so far
as they are perceptions (That is, representations accompanied by
sensation)-therefore only through empirical representation".

[A20/B34] Kant often associates sensation with the representations
caused by our receptivity, i.e. with the e,empirical intuitions caused
when our mind is affected in certain ways by objects. "The effect...

On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:02:02 -0700 (PDT), Michael Gordge
xtra.co.nz> wrote:

A claim offered as usual without proof or evidence. Why do I even
bother responding to an utter lamer such as yourself?

On Apr 12, 9:11 pm, Malrassic Park hotmail.com> wrote:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=lFloT96OAc4

Hi,

"Malrassic Park" hotmail.com> skrev i melding
news:pu1304p0f8g2egpo06ak47icfq32hlcpgc@4ax.com...

I remember I asked you that very question in the beginning.
But I think it speaks for the good in you ... never giving up on your fellow
man.
And of course it is utterly, utterly fascinating to try, by...