Existence Is Absolutely Deterministic (was: Proof of Evolution)
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Existence Is Absolutely Deterministic (was: Proof of Evolution)         


Date: Aug 4, 2007 12:19

On Jul 22, 4:00 pm, bdbry...@wherever.ur
(Bobby > In article <1184873139.211531.245...@d55g2000hsg.
googlegroups.comBryant) wrote:
>sdr sdrodrian.com> writes:
>
>> Existence is absolutely deterministic.
>
> Physicists have determined otherwise.
> --
> Bobby Bryant
> Reno, Nevada

Don't bet on it, Bobby.
Show full article (24.92Kb)
15 Comments
Re: Existence Is Absolutely Deterministic (was: Proof of Evolution)         


Author: chazwin
Date: Aug 5, 2007 02:42

On Aug 4, 8:19 pm, sdrodr...@sdrodrian.com wrote:
> On Jul 22, 4:00 pm, bdbry...@wherever.ur
> (Bobby > In article <1184873139.211531.245...@d55g2000hsg.
>
> googlegroups.comBryant) wrote:
>>sdr sdrodrian.com> writes:
>
>>> Existence is absolutely deterministic.
>
>> Physicists have determined otherwise.
>> --
>> Bobby Bryant
>> Reno, Nevada
>
> Don't bet on it, Bobby.
>
> Or, before you place that bet, at least consider
> THE SORT of "physicists" who have made
> the "claim" that there is a portion of existence
> where the laws of physics (i.e. determinism) ...
Show full article (26.59Kb)
no comments
Re: Existence Is Absolutely Deterministic (was: Proof of Evolution)         


Author: brian fletcher
Date: Aug 5, 2007 06:21

"chazwin" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1186306947.631444.101290@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 4, 8:19 pm, sdrodr...@sdrodrian.com wrote:
>> On Jul 22, 4:00 pm, bdbry...@wherever.ur
>> (Bobby > In article <1184873139.211531.245...@d55g2000hsg.
>>

SNIP
Show full article (1.84Kb)
no comments
Re: Existence Is Absolutely Deterministic (was: Proof of Evolution)         


Author: Don Stockbauer
Date: Aug 5, 2007 06:40

On Aug 5, 8:21 am, "brian fletcher" bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> "chazwin" yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1186306947.631444.101290@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
>> On Aug 4, 8:19 pm, sdrodr...@sdrodrian.com wrote:
>>> On Jul 22, 4:00 pm, bdbry...@wherever.ur
>>> (Bobby > In article <1184873139.211531.245...@d55g2000hsg.
>
> SNIP
>
> . We shall
>
>
>
>>> find that the uncertainty principle will be the key to
>>> performing the double-slit experiment over
>>> astronomical distances, and demonstrating that quantum
>>> effects are not just microscopic phenomena, but can be
>>> extended across the cosmos. ...
Show full article (2.08Kb)
no comments
Re: Existence Is Absolutely Deterministic (was: Proof of Evolution)         


Author: Art
Date: Aug 5, 2007 11:02

On Sun, 05 Aug 2007 13:21:50 GMT, "brian fletcher"
bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>> QM is simply not explicable in terms as yet used by physics. Thus far
>> physics has failed to correctly note the phenomena and conditions
>> which give rise to QM activity.
>> None of this disproves determinism, it only chllenges the arrongance
>> of physicist who insist that the world is easily determinable. QM
>> phenomena are yet to be understood correctly. Soon enough the
>> boundaries of physics will broaden and the factors which determine QM
>> will eventually be discovered.
>
>Science, on whatever level, cannot explain "itself", from QM to Cosmology.

No, but it's interesting how old dogmas and "truths" gradually die
away. For example, Newton proclaimed that time is a absolute
that flows from God. That "truth" lasted a couple of centuries
before it bit the dust.
Show full article (2.41Kb)
no comments
Re: Existence Is Absolutely Deterministic (was: Proof of Evolution)         


Author: tooly
Date: Aug 5, 2007 11:25

"Don Stockbauer" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1186321253.279939.317970@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 5, 8:21 am, "brian fletcher" bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>> "chazwin" yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1186306947.631444.101290@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>> On Aug 4, 8:19 pm, sdrodr...@sdrodrian.com wrote:
>>>> On Jul 22, 4:00 pm, bdbry...@wherever.ur
>>>> (Bobby > In article <1184873139.211531.245...@d55g2000hsg.
>>
>> SNIP
>>
>> . We shall
>>
>>
>>
>>>> find that the uncertainty principle will be the key to
>>>> performing the double-slit experiment over
>>>> astronomical distances, and demonstrating that quantum ...
Show full article (2.37Kb)
no comments
Re: Existence Is Absolutely Deterministic (was: Proof of Evolution)         


Author: Michael Gordge
Date: Aug 6, 2007 03:20

On Aug 5, 6:42 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:
> None of this disproves determinism,

Trust a fucking Kantian mystic to be waiting for the proof of a
negative.

MG
no comments
Re: Existence Is Absolutely Deterministic (was: Proof of Evolution)         


Author: Errol
Date: Aug 6, 2007 05:03

On Aug 6, 12:20 pm, Michael Gordge xtra.co.nz> wrote:
> On Aug 5, 6:42 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> None of this disproves determinism,
>
> Trust a fucking Kantian mystic to be waiting for the proof of a
> negative
> MG

Won't ewe please expalin mr. Gordge, exactly which type of determinism
you associate with mysticism.

Subtle clue. First read up on what it means.
no comments
Re: Existence Is Absolutely Deterministic (was: Proof of Evolution)         


Author: brian fletcher
Date: Aug 6, 2007 05:57

"Don Stockbauer" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1186321253.279939.317970@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 5, 8:21 am, "brian fletcher" bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>> "chazwin" yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1186306947.631444.101290@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>> On Aug 4, 8:19 pm, sdrodr...@sdrodrian.com wrote:
>>>> On Jul 22, 4:00 pm, bdbry...@wherever.ur
>>>> (Bobby > In article <1184873139.211531.245...@d55g2000hsg.
>>
>> SNIP
>>
>> . We shall
>>
>>
>>
>>>> find that the uncertainty principle will be the key to
>>>> performing the double-slit experiment over
>>>> astronomical distances, and demonstrating that quantum ...
Show full article (2.39Kb)
no comments
Re: Existence Is Absolutely Deterministic (was: Proof of Evolution)         


Author: brian fletcher
Date: Aug 6, 2007 06:02

"Art" zilch.com> wrote in message
news:2gubb3d5oisskqheiqcu632gr6f8f3g545@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 05 Aug 2007 13:21:50 GMT, "brian fletcher"
> bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
>>> QM is simply not explicable in terms as yet used by physics. Thus far
>>> physics has failed to correctly note the phenomena and conditions
>>> which give rise to QM activity.
>>> None of this disproves determinism, it only chllenges the arrongance
>>> of physicist who insist that the world is easily determinable. QM
>>> phenomena are yet to be understood correctly. Soon enough the
>>> boundaries of physics will broaden and the factors which determine QM
>>> will eventually be discovered.
>>
>>Science, on whatever level, cannot explain "itself", from QM to Cosmology.
>
> No, but it's interesting how old dogmas and "truths" gradually die
> away. For example, Newton proclaimed that time is a absolute
> that flows from God. That "truth" lasted a couple of centuries
> before it bit the dust. ...
Show full article (2.96Kb)
no comments
1 2