On Sep 8, 1:55 am, "bigflet...@
gmail.com"
gmail.com>
wrote:> On Sep 8, 3:56 pm, Immortalist
yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Sep 7, 10:13 am, kb
hotmail.com> wrote:>
>> Interesting take on basic psychology.
>
> Interesting take on your perception.
>
Interesting take on my perception of basic psychology oh holy one.
>>But if the problems arise when
>> we forget we are in the moment or when we focus on some other moments,
>> are not we doing this forgetting and focusing on other moments in this
>> moment?
>
> Be careful you dont get dizzy.
>
Why would I get dizzy?
> There are no problems. Did you forget that?
>
Yes there are problems, the man in the video said that not being in
the moment is what creates many problems.
>>We often remember and imagine other moments and sometimes this
>
>> can help us greatly in our lives, like if we remember something
>> special or imagines a way something could come out and then use the
>> memory of that assumed future moment in the next moment to solve
>> problems. So there must be good uses of other moments. I watched the
>> video but he didn't make a clear line between the healthy and
>> unhealthy uses of these abilities to break free from moments.
>
> He made it abundantly clear. Healthy and unhealthy are invalid
> judgments. There is the inflow and outflow of consciousness, one being
> intellectual (discovery) the other he described as spiritual
> (confirmational). Both streams interact and are neither healthy or
> unhealthy.Relativity leads to 'absolute' withing the individual, but
> in a state of consciousness. The mind, like the body , can then be
> treated with the respect and kept in balance.
>
I meant the problems he was talking about in the video of not focusing
on the present moment but instead focusing on the dead past or the
imagined future. [too much or just enough that is] He did say
something like of course we need to use our memories and we need to
think about what may happen in order to make choices. Health as I was
using it means when is this presencing out of sync and unhealthy since
the goal is to remain focused in the moment.
> The mind projects "from" the now, and 'appears' to involve
> 'future'.Science has proven that for an image to form in the specific
> brain cortex, takes time. Wonderful confirmation to the spiritual,
> awesome discovery for the intellect.
>
This mind is simply the activities of the brain and thinking about the
future is the activities of particular parts of the brain, as forming
an image is a result of other parts of the brain. Is that what your
trying to say or are you promoting a dualism where some part of
experience is not a result of the activities of the brain, or is the
activities of the brain.
> His explanation of the validity of the treasure map was masterful,
> given that most of the 'congregation' (and the unilty church) are
> about future projection.
>
Whatever, its seems he would talk about how the brain produces
experience, but he is probably a dualist and believe that there is
something about the self that is not a result of merely the activities
of the brain. But anyone can think clearly about the idea that there
is only the present moment whether they believe in dualism or brain/
mind identity.
> BOfL
>
>
>
>
>> - Show quoted text -
