Every action has equal & opposite reaction? as per Newton Laws.

Will it be true incase of astronomical Objects?

Two balls collide then they go away in opposite direction.
------------------------------------------------------

1. A star Collides with a Black hole? Will the Black hole eat that
star or the Black Hole will get thrown away?

Do black hole remain stationary or they revolve arround in sky?

A ball Collides with a Wall it bounce back.
--------------------------------------------------------------

A star at Edge of Universe gets Collide with the Wall of Universe.
That is it strikes the boundry of Universe. Will it bounce Back?

If I consider our Universe as a Ballon with stars as its air. And this
Ballon is expanding by someone filling inside air of stars. What will
happen when the Universe Brust. Will we see a bigger Universe?

Bye
Sanny

Sanny wrote:

Depends on the size and density of both.
:)

They are at the center of galaxies mostly and are moving with the entire
galaxy in it's orbit around the universe.

On Jun 26, 11:17 am, Sanny hotmail.com> wrote:

Wrong. When one object exerts a force on a second object, the second
object exerts a force of equal magnitude and opposite direction upon
the first.

Paul Cardinale

Paul Cardinale wrote:

hmm?
That is the same thing with extra wording.
C,mon Paul,
stop that.
Making simple stuff complex is not how people
learn it better.
:)

"Sanny" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b1a95907-e9e8-4c9a-a31b-8e33d57d89dc@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...

Not always. Newton stated that before the theory of electrodynamics was in
place. This law does not hold in EM.

Pete

Dear Sanny:

On Jun 26, 11:17 am, Sanny hotmail.com> wrote:

Two eggs collide, they do not. But momentum is conserved either way.

A black hole is not a hard surface... "collide" is the wrong word.

They will "stick", just like most reactions in Nature.

Dear Pmb:

On Jun 26, 11:36 am, "Pmb" somewhere.com> wrote:

Got an example? A magnet pulls on a paperclip, the paperclip pulls on
the magnet too. Light is transmitted between an emitter and receiver,
the net interaction maintains "conservation of momentum"...

David A. Smith

Pmb wrote:

It does to.
If you use it correctly, meaning you treat each and every electron
seperately.
but of course. that is crazy math, so you use the quicker methods.
But that does not prove Newton was wrong at all.
:)

Pmb wrote:

Pete... I'm having trouble with your statement. Does not conservation
of momentum apply in both emission abs absorption of photons, virtual
or otherwise?

Sanny wrote:

Rock covers paper,
Scissors cut paper,
Rock breaks scissors,

black holes do not exist