Even Manhatten Project Wasn't "On the Fly" R&D
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Even Manhatten Project Wasn't "On the Fly" R&D         


Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Jul 4, 2008 11:07

Not to diminish the bomb effort but at least they knew E=mc^2 three
decades before they started.

Now with peak oil everyone wants really fundamental research done "on
the wing."

They want "new mature" green industries yesterday.

I'm not saying that breakthroughs are impossible in this climate.
"When a man knows he's going to be hung in a fortnight, it
concentrates the mind wonderfully" applies to everyone.

I'm just saying that attitude makes me really really nervous.

Bret Cahill
55 Comments
Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn't "On the Fly" R&D         


Author: Bob Eld
Date: Jul 4, 2008 12:24

"Bret Cahill" aol.com> wrote in message
news:8f625c1c-50ff-47f0-b6ce-90ce2e3aee53@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> Not to diminish the bomb effort but at least they knew E=mc^2 three
> decades before they started.
>
> Now with peak oil everyone wants really fundamental research done "on
> the wing."
>
> They want "new mature" green industries yesterday.
>
> I'm not saying that breakthroughs are impossible in this climate.
> "When a man knows he's going to be hung in a fortnight, it
> concentrates the mind wonderfully" applies to everyone.
>
> I'm just saying that attitude makes me really really nervous.
>
>
> Bret Cahill
Show full article (1.89Kb)
no comments
Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn't "On the Fly" R&D         


Author: Mike Jr.
Date: Jul 4, 2008 13:48

On Jul 4, 2:07 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
> Not to diminish the bomb effort but at least they knew E=mc^2 three
> decades before they started.
>
> Now with peak oil everyone wants really fundamental research done "on
> the wing."
>
> They want "new mature" green industries yesterday.
>
> I'm not saying that breakthroughs are impossible in this climate.
> "When a man knows he's going to be hung in a fortnight, it
> concentrates the mind wonderfully" applies to everyone.
>
> I'm just saying that attitude makes me really really nervous.
>
> Bret Cahill

Nuclear power has been around for how long?

How big are the US coal reserves? How long has coal liquefaction been
around?
Show full article (0.81Kb)
no comments
Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn't "On the Fly" R&D         


Author: Bob Eld
Date: Jul 4, 2008 14:12

"Mike Jr." comcast.net> wrote in message
news:f32266b6-fe1e-4416-9050-79495b97a13e@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 4, 2:07 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>> Not to diminish the bomb effort but at least they knew E=mc^2 three
>> decades before they started.
>>
>> Now with peak oil everyone wants really fundamental research done "on
>> the wing."
>>
>> They want "new mature" green industries yesterday.
>>
>> I'm not saying that breakthroughs are impossible in this climate.
>> "When a man knows he's going to be hung in a fortnight, it
>> concentrates the mind wonderfully" applies to everyone.
>>
>> I'm just saying that attitude makes me really really nervous.
>>
>> Bret Cahill
>
> Nuclear power has been around for how long? ...
Show full article (1.90Kb)
no comments
Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn't "On the Fly" R&D         


Author: zzbunker
Date: Jul 4, 2008 14:35

On Jul 4, 2:07 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
> Not to diminish the bomb effort but at least they knew E=mc^2 three
> decades before they started.

But, even better, they knew there were neutrons three decades
before they started.
Since E=MC^2 also supposedly applies to supercomputers, if the
idiot relativers
could ever bring themselves to think about history rather simply
babbling about it.
Show full article (0.84Kb)
no comments
Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn't "On the Fly" R&D         


Author: Uncle Al
Date: Jul 4, 2008 14:30

Bret Cahill wrote:
>
> Not to diminish the bomb effort but at least they knew E=mc^2 three
> decades before they started.
>
> Now with peak oil everyone wants really fundamental research done "on
> the wing."
>
> They want "new mature" green industries yesterday.
>
> I'm not saying that breakthroughs are impossible in this climate.
> "When a man knows he's going to be hung in a fortnight, it
> concentrates the mind wonderfully" applies to everyone.
>
> I'm just saying that attitude makes me really really nervous.
>
> Bret Cahill
Show full article (2.11Kb)
no comments
Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn't "On the Fly" R&D         


Author: Uncle Al
Date: Jul 4, 2008 14:34

"zzbunker@netscape.net" wrote:
>
> On Jul 4, 2:07 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>> Not to diminish the bomb effort but at least they knew E=mc^2 three
>> decades before they started.
>
> But, even better, they knew there were neutrons three decades
> before they started.
> Since E=MC^2 also supposedly applies to supercomputers, if the
> idiot relativers
> could ever bring themselves to think about history rather simply
> babbling about it.
[snip crap]

Hey bozo - the Manhattan Project had more Jews/m^2 than a Nazi
concentration camp. The National Energy Crisis! has

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qualified.jpg
Show full article (0.80Kb)
no comments
Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn't "On the Fly" R&D         


Author: zzbunker
Date: Jul 4, 2008 16:22

On Jul 4, 5:34 pm, Uncle Al hate.spam.net> wrote:
> "zzbun...@netscape.net" wrote:
>
>> On Jul 4, 2:07 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>>> Not to diminish the bomb effort but at least they knew E=mc^2 three
>>> decades before they started.
>
>>    But, even better, they knew there were neutrons three decades
>> before they started.
>>    Since E=MC^2 also supposedly applies to supercomputers, if the
>> idiot relativers
>>    could ever bring themselves to think about history rather simply
>> babbling about it.
>
> [snip crap]
>
> Hey bozo - the Manhattan Project had more Jews/m^2 than a Nazi
> concentration camp.  The National Energy Crisis! has
Show full article (1.23Kb)
no comments
Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn't "On the Fly" R&D         


Author: Mike Jr.
Date: Jul 4, 2008 19:26

On Jul 4, 5:12 pm, "Bob Eld" yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Mike Jr." comcast.net> wrote in message
>
> news:f32266b6-fe1e-4416-9050-79495b97a13e@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>> On Jul 4, 2:07 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>>> Not to diminish the bomb effort but at least they knew E=mc^2 three
>>> decades before they started.
>
>>> Now with peak oil everyone wants really fundamental research done "on
>>> the wing."
>
>>> They want "new mature" green industries yesterday.
>
>>> I'm not saying that breakthroughs are impossible in this climate.
>>> "When a man knows he's going to be hung in a fortnight, it
>>> concentrates the mind wonderfully" applies to everyone.
> ...
Show full article (2.56Kb)
no comments
Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn't "On the Fly" R&D         


Author: Publius
Date: Jul 4, 2008 20:44

"Bob Eld" yahoo.com> wrote in
news:Hlwbk.3725$vn7.972@flpi147.ffdc.sbc.com:

Couldn't resist juxtaposing these:
> What we need is national leadership that understands this and
> is more interested in funding and pushing the development of alternative
> energy than waging war, for example. It's now a matter of national
> survival much more important than any of the silly terrorism nonsense
> ever was.

And,
> For good or for ill, it's more politics than investment that keeps us
> from doing all we know how to do.

I assume that by "national leadership" you mean gummint, right? But gummint
entails politics, which you admit is, far from being a source of solutions,
an obstacle to them.

If you want to see solutions to the energy "crisis," you'd be well-advised
to insist that gummint keep its hands off. No practical means of producing
energy has ever been conceived or developed by gummints, or under the
"leadership" of gummints.
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6