Ethics of social psychology
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Ethics of social psychology         


Author: TruthSlave
Date: Jul 7, 2008 05:30

Ethics of social psychology

"The goal of social psychology is to understand cognition and
behaviour as they naturally occur in a social context, but the
very act of observing people can influence and alter their
behaviour. For this reason, many social psychology experiments
utilize deception to conceal or distort certain aspects of the
study. Deception may include false cover stories, false
participants (known as confederates or stooges), false feedback
given to the participants, and so on."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_psychology_(psychology)

I wonder how many of those employed in this exercise can see
themselves and they part they play in this egotistical pursuit of study.
Judgement based solely on observation, presuming to know all
one needs to know just by observation.

Observation limited to circumstance, with no thought on what
goes on beyond that situation, with no thought for the part played
by experiance. Just occupied on the surface.
Show full article (1.63Kb)
3 Comments
Re: Ethics of social psychology         


Author: Reddragonf66
Date: Jul 8, 2008 07:09

On 7 jul, 14:30, "TruthSlave" home.com> wrote:
> Ethics of social psychology
>
> "The goal of social psychology is to understand cognition and
> behaviour as they naturally occur in a social context, but the
> very act of observing people can influence and alter their
> behaviour. For this reason, many social psychology experiments
> utilize deception to conceal or distort certain aspects of the
> study. Deception may include false cover stories, false
> participants (known as confederates or stooges), false feedback
> given to the participants, and so on."
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_psychology_(psychology)
>
> I wonder how many of those employed in this exercise can see
> themselves and they part they play in this egotistical pursuit of study.
> Judgement based solely on observation, presuming to know all
> one needs to know just by observation.
>
> Observation limited to circumstance, with no thought on what ...
Show full article (1.79Kb)
no comments
Re: Ethics of social psychology         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Jul 8, 2008 19:37

On Jul 7, 5:30 am, "TruthSlave" home.com> wrote:
> Ethics of social psychology
>

The Social Animal - Elliot Aronson - 8th Edition 1999
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0716733129/

Ethical Problems

Using deception may be the best (and perhaps the only) way to get
useful information about the way people behave in most complex and
important situations, but it does present the experimenter with
serious ethical problems. Basically, there are three problems:

1. It is simply unethical to tell lies to people. This takes on even
greater significance in the post-Watergate era, when it has been
revealed that government agencies have bugged citizens illegally, that
presidents tell outright lies to the people who elected them, and that
all manner of dirty tricks, fake letters, forged documents, and so on
have been used by people directly employed by the president. Can
social scientists justify adding to the pollution of deception that
currently exists?
Show full article (17.85Kb)
no comments
Re: Ethics of social psychology         


Author: Day Brown
Date: Jul 10, 2008 02:12

Part of the problem psychology faces is the unwillingness to challenge
Christian sensibilities. Many of the social problems we have derive from
this misogynistic cosmology and its inherent racism.

After all, The Bible early on reports on what Joshua did to the
Canaanites that we now call genocide. Much of what Jesus and then St.
Paul had to say was based on submission to alpha male tyranny.
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: she'd process noisily than laugh with Basksh's ethical socialismnews.admin.netabuse.email ·