> Most people have heard "the end never justifies the means".  I beleive
> this to be true.
>
> If someone has accomplished a task through unfair means should they
> keep it?
>
> Example, if someone has acheived a cure for cancer by experimenting on
> rats should they keep the cure? The rats didn't suffer and die for
> nothing, right?
>
> The argument against this is two-fold.
> 1) it sets a bad example and will encourage more bad behavior
> 2)if the rat is in Heaven he will "give you back" the cure and you can
> accept it with a clean conscience.  If he's not in Heaven, all the
> more reason you should at least die (or live) trying to restore the
> rat to originality.
>
> C3

> On Apr 20, 9:20 pm, C3 aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> Most people have heard "the end never justifies the means".  I beleive
>> this to be true.

>

>> If someone has accomplished a task through unfair means should they
>> keep it?

>

>> Example, if someone has acheived a cure for cancer by experimenting on
>> rats should they keep the cure? The rats didn't suffer and die for
>> nothing, right?

>

>> The argument against this is two-fold.
>> 1) it sets a bad example and will encourage more bad behavior
>> 2)if the rat is in Heaven he will "give you back" the cure and you can ...