| Re: Empirical Beliefs & Hypothesis |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Aug 23, 2008 23:19
On Aug 23, 4:36 pm, John Larkin
highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:01:25 -0700 (PDT), Immortalist
>
> yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Descartes attempts to create a foundationalist philosophy based on a
>>single, undeniable truth which he knows to be "fixed and assured". He
>>takes "I think, therefore I am" "as the first principle of the
>>philosophy I was seeking", believing that this is the only truth which
>>is necessary to found a philosophy. His logical structure , however,
>>relies on a second postulate. He claims that "the capacity to judge
>>correctly and to distinguish the true from the false is naturally
>>equal in all men". This postulate is more fundamental to his logical
>>structure than the cogito because without it, he cannot escape the
>>skepticism of his foundationalist structure.
>
> That's just silly. Some people have no talent for thinking, and a lot
> of people who potentially have talent haven't practised enough to get
> any good at it.
>
> Learning to think is like learning most other things: have some good
> instructors; do it a lot; get good feedback.
>
> Descartes obviously didn't.
>
> John
But weren't you attempting to create a foundationalist philosophy
based on a single, undeniable truth, the giveness of sense data which
you somehow believe is "fixed and assured"? But if that were all
there was to this truth, there would be just the seemingness of sense
experience. In order to say anything else about it or interpret the
seemingness of sense wouldn't you need the capacity to judge correctly
and to distinguish the true from the false? These arguments are
separate from the sense data given.
|