|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: turtoniturtoni Date: Jun 21, 2008 19:25
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence
Definitions
The concept behind the term has been in use since at least the time of
Aristotle.[1] John Stuart Mill and Julian Huxley are just some of the
historic luminaries who have written on the concept.
The term "emergent" was coined by the pioneer psychologist G. H.
Lewes, who wrote:
"Every resultant is either a sum or a difference of the co-operant
forces; their sum, when their directions are the same -- their
difference, when their directions are contrary. Further, every
resultant is clearly traceable in its components, because these are
homogeneous and commensurable. It is otherwise with emergents, when,
instead of adding measurable motion to measurable motion, or things of
one kind to other individuals of their kind, there is a co-operation
of things of unlike kinds. The emergent is unlike its components
insofar as these are incommensurable, and it cannot be reduced to
their sum or their difference." (Lewes 1875, p. 412)(Blitz 1992)
|
| Show full article (24.89Kb) |
|
| | 5 Comments |
|
  |
Author: zinniczinnic Date: Jun 23, 2008 00:28
On Jun 21, 9:25 pm, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence
>
> Definitions
> The concept behind the term has been in use since at least the time of
> Aristotle.[1] John Stuart Mill and Julian Huxley are just some of the
> historic luminaries who have written on the concept.
>
> The term "emergent" was coined by the pioneer psychologist G. H.
>
> Lewes, who wrote:
>
> "Every resultant is either a sum or a difference of the co-operant
> forces; their sum, when their directions are the same -- their
> difference, when their directions are contrary. Further, every
> resultant is clearly traceable in its components, because these are
> homogeneous and commensurable. It is otherwise with emergents, when,
> instead of adding measurable motion to measurable motion, or things of
> one kind to other individuals of their kind, there is a co-operation
> of things of unlike kinds. The emergent is unlike its components ...
|
| Show full article (28.41Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: turtoniturtoni Date: Jun 23, 2008 10:18
On Jun 23, 3:28 am, zinnic gate.net> wrote:
> On Jun 21, 9:25 pm, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
>
>
>> Definitions
>> The concept behind the term has been in use since at least the time of
>> Aristotle.[1] John Stuart Mill and Julian Huxley are just some of the
>> historic luminaries who have written on the concept.
>
>> The term "emergent" was coined by the pioneer psychologist G. H.
>
>> Lewes, who wrote:
>
>> "Every resultant is either a sum or a difference of the co-operant
>> forces; their sum, when their directions are the same -- their
>> difference, when their directions are contrary. Further, every
>> resultant is clearly traceable in its components, because these are
>> homogeneous and commensurable. It is otherwise with emergents, when,
>> instead of adding measurable motion to measurable motion, or things of ...
|
| Show full article (29.61Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Don StockbauerDon Stockbauer Date: Jun 23, 2008 18:05
On Jun 23, 11:18 am, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
> On Jun 23, 3:28 am, zinnic gate.net> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 21, 9:25 pm, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> Definitions
>>> The concept behind the term has been in use since at least the time of
>>> Aristotle.[1] John Stuart Mill and Julian Huxley are just some of the
>>> historic luminaries who have written on the concept.
>
>>> The term "emergent" was coined by the pioneer psychologist G. H.
>
>>> Lewes, who wrote:
>
>>> "Every resultant is either a sum or a difference of the co-operant
>>> forces; their sum, when their directions are the same -- their
>>> difference, when their directions are contrary. Further, every
>>> resultant is clearly traceable in its components, because these are ...
|
| Show full article (10.44Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: turtoniturtoni Date: Jun 23, 2008 23:16
On Jun 23, 9:05 pm, Don Stockbauer hotmail.com> wrote:
> Why don't yall work up a procedure which predicts emergent phenomena
> given the set of constituent systems and their configuration?
"The first cell did not originate from a pre-existing cell"
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: zinniczinnic Date: Jun 24, 2008 08:14
On Jun 23, 8:05 pm, Don Stockbauer hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 23, 11:18 am, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 23, 3:28 am, zinnic gate.net> wrote:
>
>>> On Jun 21, 9:25 pm, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
>
>
> Why don't yall work up a procedure which predicts emergent phenomena
> given the set of constituent systems and their configuration?
Chemical polymerisation in which polymers emerge from a mixture of
monomers.
Good example is DNA replication. Two for the price of one, four for
the price of two, eight for the price of four etc, etc.
Also fertilization in which union of sperm and ova eventually
results in 'emergence of silly old codgers like me!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|