On Sep 1, 11:41 am, Sanny
hotmail.com> wrote:> Ptolemaic system considered earth to be in Center of Universe and
> created paths for other planets as complex as possible.
Comments sprinkled through.
>
> Ptolemaic made the assumptions based on Observations. The Observations
> were correct but conclusion was wrong.
>
> And today we know Earth & Planets revolve round the Sun.
>
> Einstine similarly has made a few wrong assumptions and created
> complex equations for the Universe.
1. It's "Einstein", not "Einstine".
2. The equations are not complex. Why do you think they're complex?
>
> 1. Light speed is always constant [Wrong]
>
> We Observe that light speed is same always but it does not mean that
> observation is correct.
3. Experiment is how truth is determined in science. If you do not
trust experiment, then you will make no progress in science. What you
are doing instead is philosophy at best.
> The appratus/ mechanism used is false.
4. This is the reason why experiments are both repeated and
corroborated independently. If two independent experiments with
different apparati come up with the same result, then it is unlikely
that the result is wrong.
>
> 2. Nothing can travel faster than light [Wrong]
>
> Only because fastest known object is light we cannot make anything
> travel faster than that.
>
> If a bus in town is the fastest mode of travel. It does not mean
> Nothing can go faster than the Bus.
5. This is true. It is not *proven* that nothing can go faster than
light. But the fact remains is that nothing, spanning all the
available forces in the universe, has ever produced a particle
observed to go faster than c. And the theory that predicts that
nothing will ever be found to go faster than c has been right on a
hundred other points. While this does not *prove* that nothing can go
faster than c, it certainly does give us some confidence that nothing
goes faster than c. It is *certainly* true that getting to a speed
faster than c is neither easy nor obvious.
>
> 3. Mass tends to infinity when an object reaches speed of light
> [Wrong]
>
> When a body travels with speed "v". the K.E is 1/2 m v^2. So It is the
> Kinetic energy that increases and not the mass.
6. The formula that you just wrote is a low-speed approximation only.
This formula does not work for kinetic energy in general.
>
> ---------------------
>
> Einstine theory is proved by false Observations.
>
> I will proove 3 is equal to 5 by wrong Observations.
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Say x=3; and y=5; I will proove x==y;
>
> x=3 Ok.
> y=5 Ok
>
> Let n=x+y ok
> Let m=y+x ok
>
> If n==m then y equals x
7. But this step right there is KNOWN to be wrong. A 7th grader would
know this is wrong. Choose x=3, y=4, so that n=7 and m=7. Clearly n=m
does not imply that 3=4.
>
> Since n is equal to m, y = x
>
> So 3 is equal to 5. [Prooved]
8. It would only be proved to someone who doesn't have the foggiest
idea what they're doing with the math.
>
> ---------------------------------
>
> So you see how I prooved 3 is equal to 5. Same way Einstine theories
> "A bunch of Crap" is prooved by Maths.
>
> These equations may be correct but physical interpretations are wrong.
>
> Bye
> Sanny
>
> Be
Intelligent:http://www.GetClub.com/
