>
> "Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li" wrote in message
> news:45155d07$1_1@news.tiscalinet.ch...

>>

>>> What you wrote is a non-sequitur. It says it
>>> answers, but it does not, the question. " What
>>> makes you think, whatever your are, Dung-Eating
>>> Klingon Between Hairy Cheeks, that you can
>>> fare any better?

>>
>> You have been told.
>>

>
> Saying so doesn't make it so.
>
>
>

>>> Try again and cut down a bit on the acronyms.

>>
>> No -
>> If you wish to coment, you must learn to comply
>> with ICS (Informed Common Sense).
>>

>
> You Can't Understand Normal Thinking (CUNT)
>
>

>>> I call idiots as they see them. That's no dogmatism.

>>
>> As you like - the readers decide for themselves about
>> your dogmatism.
>>

>
> A non-answer. Your posts are like seeing a stumbling wino dressed in
> military uniform with lots of medals made of beer caps.
>
>
>
>

>>> You are here clearly to impress someone. Good luck.

>>
>> Thanks.
>>

>
> You will not feel welcome.
>
>
>
>

>>>> What you sci.stultificated wise guy also misjudged
>>>> was the stress put on criticising Medieval & generall
>>>> history, simultaneously implying that of course Religion
>>>> - in the form of sciences or any other faiths - are, of
>>>> course, making people worse, not better.

>>>
>>> Religion in the form of science?

>>
>> There's quite a lot of literature on science as a form
>> of religion - but obviously obtaining knowledge is not
>> your hobby.
>>

>
> There is a lot of literature on the Loch Ness monster.
>
> I see your standard of evidence is as low as your I.Q.
>
> Two digit?
>
>
>

>>> Are you fucking high or is that extra chromosome
>>> making you like that?

>>
>> Its a better quality brain - but you wouldn't know about
>> such advantages by birth.
>>

>
> Any advantage you had at birth was fucked in the ass by your nurturing.
>
>
>

>> I suggest you take some cues from the acronyms
>> you lost on the way:
>>

>
> I suggest you lost your marbles somewhere along the way among your

>
>
>