You are correct:

As to his denial in the Jones deposition that he and Ms. Lewinsky had not
had a "sexual relationship," the President maintained that there can be no
sexual relationship without sexual intercourse, regardless of what other
sexual activities may transpire. He stated that "most ordinary Americans"
would embrace this distinction.

The President also maintained that none of his sexual contacts with Ms.
Lewinsky constituted "sexual relations" within a specific definition used in
the Jones deposition. Under that definition: (Definition in Exhibit 1)

[A] person engages in "sexual relations" when the person knowingly engages
in or causes -- contact with the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner
thigh, or buttocks of any person with an intent to arouse or gratify the
sexual desire of any person . . . . "Contact" means intentional touching,
either directly or through clothing.
Mr. Clinton is a smart man - are we really supposed to believe that he does
not consider his actions with Lewinsky as sex, as described in Exhibit 1?!
COME ON! I am not repeating the sexual details here - people can read the
report themselves, but can anyone honestly say, after reading the report and
the details of Lewinsky and Clinton's relationship that the President's
actions with Lewinsky were not sex under Definition 1? Clinton also
testified that he didn't remember being alone with Lewsinsky - are we to
really believe that? He stated that Monica's original testimony, in which
she stated there was no sexual contact, was accurate. Can people honestly
say that isn't a lie?
http://www.rightgrrl.com/carolyn/starr1.html