If it could be done the way you say ... would you support
creating a myth of God? What would it be, if you do think
so? If not, do you think there should be a law against the
stories of religion?

"AKA gray asphalt" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:USPTj.112284$497.52271@newsfe14.phx...

Sure, create the myth, create the God, until he is in fact created
and will save us all from ourselves.

On May 5, 8:21 pm, "Mark Earnest" yahoo.com> wrote:

If we created it we would probable become it. Transfer ourselves into
it and then we could whorship ourselves;

In the beginning Man created God; and in the image of Man created he
him.

2 And Man gave unto God a multitude of names, that he might be Lord
over all the earth when it was suited to Man.

3 And on the seven millionth day Man rested and did lean heavily on
his God and saw that it was good.

AKA gray asphalt wrote:

The prehistory is obscure, but back when Native Europeans worshipped
Gaia, the Great Earth Mother, there was peace.

This is easy to understand when you consider the problem a demagogue
would have trying to rile up a mob or an army by claiming that *he*
speaks in *HER* name.

The other thing about the Native European creation myth is that it is
consistent with science- like chaos theory and quantum mechanics.

The primordial substance was Chaos. But as anyone who understands chaos
theory and software knows, eventually you get a self-replicating form.
in this case, Gaia. Who, because of random error in replication evolved,
and did so to the point of sentience.

On May 5, 9:31 pm, Day Brown hughes.net> wrote:

On 6 Mag, 00:00, "AKA gray asphalt" gmail.com> wrote:

Dear friend, I know it and I tell it.

God is "all the possible", how the integral system of all the
possibilities.
Why? The answer at this question is not difficult.
"COGITO, ERGO SUM", that is "I think, so I am"... and, as the GOD "I
AM" (Jahve), I also am "myself", in my only "divine" possibility to
exist, since this possibility absolutely transcends myself.

The prehistory, Immortalist, is obscure, resting mostly in little known
Transylvanian Museums that were so long inaccessable behind the Iron
Curtain.

At what point is the absence of evidence, evidence? If you dig into a
tel, like they have done by the Danube, and date the artifacts, you find
they range from 8000 to 4000 BC. You mite eventually realize the entire
set lacks weapons.

What does *EVERY* culture you know about do when it first gets metal?
make weapons. Yet, these Transylvanians are the first people to have
arsenic bronze. Sometime in the 6th mil BC. Thousands of years before
your other sources you cite think the bronze age began. This alloy is
the hardest and strongest of all the bronzes.

The 5th image down at http://daybrown.org/artifax/artifax.html shows a
seated shaman. That thing on his right shoulder is a bronze grain
sickle. They have found other examples from this era, 7000+ years ago.
The transylvanians- (including Cucuteni, Petresti, Vinca) also left us
wood working tools, belt buckles, kitchen utinsels, jewlery, and clasps
made of arsenic bronze. Nobody found any daggars, swords, helmets,
armor, or spear points.