| Re: Do Sock Puppets Count As Readership? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: John LarkinJohn Larkin Date: Aug 28, 2008 22:16
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:57:21 -0700 (PDT), BretCahill@ peoplepc.com
wrote:
>Put out the shoe and the idiots fall over themselves trying to get
>their feet to get.
>
>>>If you get a lot of responses under different handles, all with
>>>nothing to say, is it any better than having zero readership of people
>>>with somethig to say?
>
>> If your posts are content-free, does it matter how many people
>> respond?
>
>Why would anyone (except maybe a sock puppeteer with nothing to say)
>respond to a content-free post?
>
>You stepped right into that one.
>
>
>
>
Why do you post to sci.electronics.basics when you have nothing to say
about electronics?
Why do you keep playing these silly grammar-school games?
Why post admittedly content-free crap?
I don't know what your sock puppet obsession is about. I suppose you
like the words or something.
Ever drive a tractor?
What's your opinion on analog versus digital oscilloscopes? What kind
of scope do you have?
John
| 
