|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: pjmutnickpjmutnick Date: Dec 21, 2007 03:47
On Dec 21, 2:31 am, "Shmuel Playfair" wrote:
>
> [Shmuel] You begin with the assumption that your "god,
> the angel", or "your god, the son", "appears in human form".
> OTOH, our single Creator has *no* visible form. He is
> the God that no man has ever seen or ever can see. So we
> understand His messengers (angels) to be His creations
> by whom He delivers messages to His human creatures.
What God is your God who has *no* visible form? Moshe saw the back
parts of the LORD in the burning bush. If you are referring to En
Sof, G-D, I know Him well.
|
| |
|
| | 48 Comments |
|
|
Author: LedraychereLedraychere Date: Dec 21, 2007 13:37
> On Dec 21, 2:31 am, "Shmuel Playfair" wrote:
>
>
>
>> [Shmuel] You begin with the assumption that your "god,
>> the angel", or "your god, the son", "appears in human form".
>> OTOH, our single Creator has *no* visible form. He is
>> the God that no man has ever seen or ever can see. So we
>> understand His messengers (angels) to be His creations
>> by whom He delivers messages to His human creatures.
>
> What God is your God who has *no* visible form? Moshe saw the back
> parts of the LORD in the burning bush. If you are referring to En
> Sof, G-D, I know Him well.
To pjmutn :
No . Jesus always referred to himself as the "Son
of Man" . It was only when Peter proclaimed him to be
the Son of God did Jesus say " Bless you...
|
| Show full article (3.04Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: LedraychereLedraychere Date: Dec 22, 2007 15:22
On Dec 22, 6:08 pm, Michael Gray newsguy.com> wrote:> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:37:24 -0800 (PST), Ledraychere
>
>
>
>
>
> gmail.com> wrote:>>> On Dec 21, 2:31 am, "Shmuel Playfair" wrote:
>
>>>> [Shmuel] You begin with the assumption that your "god,
>>>> the angel", or "your god, the son", "appears in human form".
>>>> OTOH, our single Creator has *no* visible form. He is
>>>> the God that no man has ever seen or ever can see. So we
>>>> understand His messengers (angels) to be His creations
>>>> by whom He delivers messages to His human creatures.
>
>>> What God is your God who has *no* visible form? Moshe saw the back
>>> parts of the LORD in the burning bush. If you are referring to En ...
|
| Show full article (1.19Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Darrell StecDarrell Stec Date: Dec 22, 2007 17:27
Bill M wrote:
> Sane persons have never seen any 'angels either! (except after to much
> time at the bar!)
>
That is not exactly true. I know an Angel and she looks like one too. Too
bad she is married to another man, a total controlling lout.
--
Later,
Darrell Stec darstec@ neo.rr.com
Webpage Sorcery
http://webpagesorcery.com
We Put the Magic in Your Webpages
|
| |
| 8 Comments |
|
|
Author: LedraychereLedraychere Date: Dec 22, 2007 18:36
On Dec 22, 8:27 pm, Darrell Stec webpagesorcery.com>
wrote:> Bill M wrote:
>> Sane persons have never seen any 'angels either! (except after to much
>> time at the bar!)
>
> That is not exactly true. I know an Angel and she looks like one too. Too
> bad she is married to another man, a total controlling lout.
>
> --
> Later,
> Darrell Stec dars...@ neo.rr.com
>
> Webpage Sorceryhttp://webpagesorcery.com
> We Put the Magic in Your Webpages
To Darrell Stec and whoever else is reading :
So , as I understand your point . If you
haven't seen any angels there is no God ?
Is that about right ?
|
| Show full article (0.68Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: LedraychereLedraychere Date: Dec 22, 2007 18:56
On Dec 22, 9:44 pm, Christopher A.Lee optonline.net> wrote:> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:36:49 -0800 (PST), Ledraychere
>
>
>
>
>
> gmail.com> wrote:>>On Dec 22, 8:27 pm, Darrell Stec webpagesorcery.com>
>>wrote:>>> Bill M wrote:
>>>> Sane persons have never seen any 'angels either! (except after to much
>>>> time at the bar!)
>
>>> That is not exactly true. I know an Angel and she looks like one too. Too
>>> bad she is married to another man, a total controlling lout.
>
>>> --
>>> Later,
>>> Darrell Stec dars...@ neo.rr.com ...
|
| Show full article (1.14Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Christopher A.LeeChristopher A.Lee Date: Dec 22, 2007 19:01
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:56:26 -0800 (PST), Ledraychere
gmail.com> wrote:
>On Dec 22, 9:44 pm, Christopher A.Lee optonline.net> wrote:>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:36:49 -0800 (PST), Ledraychere
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> gmail.com> wrote:>>>On Dec 22, 8:27 pm, Darrell...
|
| Show full article (1.27Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: LedraychereLedraychere Date: Dec 22, 2007 19:11
On Dec 22, 10:01 pm, Christopher A.Lee optonline.net> wrote:> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:56:26 -0800 (PST), Ledraychere
>
>
>
>
>
> gmail.com> wrote:>>On Dec 22, 9:44 pm, Christopher A.Lee optonline.net> wrote:>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:36:49 -0800 (PST), Ledraychere
>
>>>>On Dec 22, 8:27 pm, Darrell Stec webpagesorcery.com>
>>>>wrote:>>>>> Bill M wrote:
>>>>>> Sane persons have never seen any 'angels either! (except after to much
>>>>>> time at the bar!)
>
>>>>> That is not exactly true. I know an Angel and she looks like one too. Too
>>>>> bad she is married to another man, a total controlling lout. ...
|
| Show full article (1.69Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
