Re: Defending an atheist perspective ...[LONG POST]
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Re: Defending an atheist perspective ...[LONG POST]         


Author: Milan
Date: Dec 31, 2006 12:14

"someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:1167595711.650827.275060@i12g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Milan wrote:
>> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
>> news:1167592273.142735.284930@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>
>> [snip]
>>>> If a robot can mimic a human so well that it can seem to be conscious,
>>>> then the only reason to assume that it isn't conscious is that you
>>>> think
>>>> that consciousness involves something other than physical patterns. To
>>>> a dualist, that is the case. To a monist, it isn't, and you can't
>>>> assume
>>>> that because you (or indeed, I) consider consciousness to be more than
>>>> neural activity that everyone else does as well.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It has nothing to do with my understanding of the monist perspective. ...
Show full article (2.40Kb)
151 Comments
Re: Defending an atheist perspective ...[LONG POST]         


Author: someone3
Date: Dec 31, 2006 12:23

Milan wrote:
> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:1167595711.650827.275060@i12g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Milan wrote:
>>> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1167592273.142735.284930@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>>> If a robot can mimic a human so well that it can seem to be conscious,
>>>>> then the only reason to assume that it isn't conscious is that you
>>>>> think
>>>>> that consciousness involves something other than physical patterns. To
>>>>> a dualist, that is the case. To a monist, it isn't, and you can't
>>>>> assume
>>>>> that because you (or indeed, I) consider consciousness to be more than
>>>>> neural activity that everyone else does as well.
>>>>>
>>>> ...
Show full article (2.68Kb)
150 Comments
Re: Defending an atheist perspective ...[LONG POST]         


Author: Mujin
Date: Dec 31, 2006 12:57

In article <1167596582.457658.51440@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
glenn.spigel3@btinternet.com says...
>
> Milan wrote:
>> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
>> news:1167595711.650827.275060@i12g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> Milan wrote:
>>>> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:1167592273.142735.284930@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [snip]
>>>>>> If a robot can mimic a human so well that it can seem to be conscious,
>>>>>> then the only reason to assume that it isn't conscious is that you
>>>>>> think
>>>>>> that consciousness involves something other than physical patterns. To
>>>>>> a dualist, that is the case. To a monist, it isn't, and you can't
>>>>>> assume
>>>>>> that because you (or indeed, I) consider consciousness to be more than ...
Show full article (6.27Kb)
149 Comments
Re: Defending an atheist perspective ...[LONG POST]         


Author: someone3
Date: Dec 31, 2006 14:03

Mujin wrote:
> In article <1167596582.457658.51440@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
> glenn.spigel3@btinternet.com says...
>>
>> Milan wrote:
>>> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1167595711.650827.275060@i12g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>> Milan wrote:
>>>>> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:1167592273.142735.284930@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>> If a robot can mimic a human so well that it can seem to be conscious,
>>>>>>> then the only reason to assume that it isn't conscious is that you
>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>> that consciousness involves something other than physical patterns. To
>>>>>>> a dualist, that is the case. To a monist, it isn't, and you can't
>>>>>>> assume ...
Show full article (7.06Kb)
148 Comments
Re: Defending an atheist perspective ...[LONG POST]         


Author: Mujin
Date: Dec 31, 2006 18:27

In article <1167602599.071813.230370@k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
glenn.spigel3@btinternet.com says...
>
> Mujin wrote:
>> In article <1167596582.457658.51440@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
>> glenn.spigel3@btinternet.com says...
>>>
>>> Milan wrote:
>>>> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:1167595711.650827.275060@i12g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> Milan wrote:
>>>>>> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:1167592273.142735.284930@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>>> If a robot can mimic a human so well that it can seem to be conscious,
>>>>>>>> then the only reason to assume that it isn't conscious is that you
>>>>>>>> think ...
Show full article (9.27Kb)
147 Comments
Re: Defending an atheist perspective ...[LONG POST]         


Author: Mujin
Date: Dec 31, 2006 21:05

In article newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
jimmenegay@sbcglobal.net says...
>
> "Mujin" wrote in message news:MPG.20022d621b5cebbc9897a9@news.cc.umanitoba.ca...
>> To a monist, it *does*not*matter* what the internal mechanism is, if
>> the stimulus-behaviour pattern of entity A is indistinguishable from
>> that of a known conscious entity B, then *both* A and B must be
>> conscious.
>
> That is very close to the position I was taking. But one minor clarification.
> What you said is true only so long as consciousness remains something
> of a mystery - so long as we don't know the internal mechanism.

I'm not sure this is the case. (assuming that you're referring to
the bit of my post you quoted, and not to my position that neither
monists nor dualists can know with certainty whether another entity
is conscious or not)
Show full article (2.48Kb)
no comments
Re: Defending an atheist perspective ...[LONG POST]         


Author: someone3
Date: Jan 1, 2007 02:44

Mujin wrote:
> In article <1167602599.071813.230370@k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> glenn.spigel3@btinternet.com says...
>>
>> Mujin wrote:
>>> In article <1167596582.457658.51440@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
>>> glenn.spigel3@btinternet.com says...
>>>>
>>>> Milan wrote:
>>>>> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:1167595711.650827.275060@i12g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Milan wrote:
>>>>>>> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:1167592273.142735.284930@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>>>> If a robot can mimic a human so well that it can seem to be conscious,
>>>>>>>>> then the only reason to assume that it isn't conscious is that you ...
Show full article (9.84Kb)
145 Comments
Re: Defending an atheist perspective ...[LONG POST]         


Author: Diane L
Date: Jan 1, 2007 04:00

someone3 wrote:
> Mujin wrote:
>> In article <1167602599.071813.230370@k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
>> glenn.spigel3@btinternet.com says...
>>>
>>> Mujin wrote:
>>>> In article <1167596582.457658.51440@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> glenn.spigel3@btinternet.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> Milan wrote:
>>>>>> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:1167595711.650827.275060@i12g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Milan wrote:
>>>>>>>> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:1167592273.142735.284930@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>>>>> If a robot can mimic a human so well that it can seem to be ...
Show full article (10.55Kb)
142 Comments
Re: Defending an atheist perspective ...[LONG POST]         


Author: someone3
Date: Jan 1, 2007 04:55

Diane L wrote:
> someone3 wrote:
>> Mujin wrote:
>>> In article <1167602599.071813.230370@k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
>>> glenn.spigel3@btinternet.com says...
>>>>
>>>> Mujin wrote:
>>>>> In article <1167596582.457658.51440@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> glenn.spigel3@btinternet.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Milan wrote:
>>>>>>> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:1167595711.650827.275060@i12g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Milan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:1167592273.142735.284930@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [snip] ...
Show full article (11.40Kb)
141 Comments
Re: Defending an atheist perspective ...[LONG POST]         


Author: Milan
Date: Jan 1, 2007 10:08

"someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:1167648247.320769.245520@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Mujin wrote:
>> In article <1167602599.071813.230370@k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
>> glenn.spigel3@btinternet.com says...
>>>
>>> Mujin wrote:
>>>> In article <1167596582.457658.51440@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> glenn.spigel3@btinternet.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> Milan wrote:
>>>>>> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:1167595711.650827.275060@i12g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Milan wrote:
>>>>>>>> "someone3" btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:1167592273.142735.284930@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...
Show full article (10.76Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9