Up |
|
|
  |
Author: BretCahillBretCahill Date: Jun 26, 2008 14:10
>>>> One case does not a body of law make.
>>> If there is only one case, then it represents 100%% of the cases.
>> Which ain't a body of law.
> In your mind,
Get back to us after you find some reference or legal scholar that
calls one or 2 cases a "body of law."
Bret Cahill
|
| |
|
| | 17 Comments |
|
  |
Author: JohnJohn Date: Jun 26, 2008 15:00
>>>>> One case does not a body of law make.
>
>>>> If there is only one case, then it represents 100%% of the cases.
>
>>> Which ain't a body of law.
>
>> In your mind,
>
> Get back to us after you find some reference or legal scholar that
> calls one or 2 cases a "body of law."
One example of a body of law: Constitutional Law. A damned good example
at that.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Jun 26, 2008 20:47
>>>>> One case does not a body of law make.
>>>> If there is only one case, then it represents 100%% of the cases.
>>> Which ain't a body of law.
>> In your mind,
>
> Get back to us after you find some reference or legal scholar that
> calls one or 2 cases a "body of law."
>
> Bret Cahill
A body is a collection of particulars considered as a system while
there are other particulars not included in that system, usually of a
finite set; "a body of law"; "a body of doctrine"; "a body of
precedents"
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define
Examples from a wiki;
Criminal law is the body of law that defines criminal offences and the
penalties for convicted offenders.
|
| Show full article (0.87Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: Jun 26, 2008 20:56
> A body is a collection of particulars
"Particulars" is _plural_.
One case law ain't plural.
End of discussion.
> considered as a system
If you cannot Shephardize it, then it ain't a "system."
End of discussion.
Bret Cahill
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: BretCahillBretCahill Date: Jun 26, 2008 22:20
>> If you cannot Shephardize it, then it ain't a "system."
>
>> End of discussion.
>
> If you cannot Shepardize it, it might just be because you cannot
> Shepardize it, not because it cannot be Shepardized.
Try that theory with 1st Amend. case law.
Bret Cahill
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: DeadratDeadrat Date: Jun 26, 2008 23:35
>> A body is a collection of particulars
>
> "Particulars" is _plural_.
>
> One case law ain't plural.
>
> End of discussion.
>
>> considered as a system
>
> If you cannot Shephardize it, then it ain't a "system."
>
> End of discussion.
>
>
> Bret Cahill
Now that you're done bloviating, answer a simple question:
|
| Show full article (0.48Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: JohnJohn Date: Jun 27, 2008 09:16
Bret Cahill wrote:
>> A body is a collection of particulars
>
> "Particulars" is _plural_.
>
> One case law ain't plural.
>
> End of discussion.
My Dear Desperado, Case Law can embrace a whole field of study which may
contain many singular cases. You would have it that we cannot consider
singular cases at all. But the issue is not about your opinion. It is
about what is.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: JohnJohn Date: Jun 27, 2008 09:18
Bret Cahill wrote:
> If you cannot Shephardize it, then it ain't a "system."
You insist upon misspelling Shepardize, so I suspect you haven't any
legal research at hand and have done no study of it in the past. I do,
and I have. Would you like a window into the field? Or do you insist
upon ranting like an ignorant lunatic?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: JohnJohn Date: Jun 27, 2008 09:21
>>> If you cannot Shephardize it, then it ain't a "system."
>>> End of discussion.
>> If you cannot Shepardize it, it might just be because you cannot
>> Shepardize it, not because it cannot be Shepardized.
>
> Try that theory with 1st Amend. case law.
I have 997 citations. Where do you want to start?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: Jun 27, 2008 09:26
> Case Law can embrace a whole field of study which may
> contain many singular cases.
But you just have one case, and even there it isn't clear if the Court
was just humoring some idle law clerks.
Bret Cahill
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|
|