Re: Corrosive Psychology?
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Corrosive Psychology?         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: brian fletcher
Date: Nov 21, 2007 05:38

"TruthSlave" home.com> wrote in message news:fi0kjt$ant$1@aioe.org...
> Corrosive psychology?
>
> This relationship is practiced as them and us. Sapling management
> co-opted to poison the relationships which exist between it and
> the rest. Proving itself. Unable to attest the subtle form of
> their own abuse, they adapt to abuse others. Cold. Indifferent.
>
> It seems any candid mention of conditions, becomes reason enough
> to justify this crude display of peak. The rest of the workforce
> must sit and watch, dumbfounded. Watch and absorb, as the 'one
> to many' is exploited as though it were 'one to one'. Another
> example of the maddening broadcast, exposing their minds for all
> to see, feel, and silently adapt to.
>
> It is not suppose to register as anything other than background
> noise. Chatter lost on all except the most susceptible, yet on
> this one, it is heard and understood. Heard clearly, as though
> the room were silent and they alone were speaking. Nothing subtle,
> just unexpected. Disappointingly so.
>
> Matter of fact, routine, corrosive. Whatever one does or say, to
> justify harm to others, must on some level change you, twist you.
> However one justifies this psychotic sport, it can only undermine
> any potential relationship to the world.
>
> It reflects an unspoken law of The Advantage. Wherever an advantage
> is discovered in abusing a few, that advantage will find its way
> into the practices which are later imposed on the many. Its almost
> as if the advantage had a will of its own, and once evoked, could
> not be contained. How does one suppress an economic imperative?
> Once discovered, the thing grows, its roots lost to routine.
> Growing until all that remains are the conditions few understand,
> yet all must endure.
>
> Cold indifference, if this is what it takes to climb the next
> rung then i want no part of it.

To be able to start to make such observations, by definition, indicates you
are growing beyond that stage.

Back to the last thread. Your observation are accurate and predictable. The
individual only appears to be "part of it",hence a number of masters have
referred to variations on the theme "to be in it but not of it".

BOfL
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!