Contrasting Pair: Matter and Nothingness
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Contrasting Pair: Matter and Nothingness         


Author: Roy Jose Lorr
Date: Feb 26, 2008 12:30

"Matter exists on the motion created by Nothingness drawing Matter back
into the Nothingness from whence it came."

Constructive comments in simple terms, pro and con will be appreciated.
102 Comments
Re: Contrasting Pair: Matter and Nothingness         


Author: Mary Hogan
Date: Feb 26, 2008 13:31

"Roy Jose Lorr" comcast.net> wrote in message
news:_P2dnTRUorNC61nanZ2dnUVZ_q-jnZ2d@comcast.com...
> "Matter exists on the motion created by Nothingness drawing Matter back
> into the Nothingness from whence it came."
>
> Constructive comments in simple terms, pro and con will be appreciated.
>

I am not qualified for any debate about physics, and so I'm just thinking
out loud.

Time is missing from this.
Light and darkness are missing.
Nothingness seems to need an opposite. If there is matter, that is
something, then how can it be drawn into nothingness, without being
obliterated and non existent? Like Genesis 1:5 what is yom when the sun
wasn't created? Time.

Matter is potential which exists on the motion (which requires time) of
everythingness (oneness) drawing
it back after the potential has either been wasted or refined into
everythingness from whence it came.
Show full article (1.10Kb)
no comments
Re: Contrasting Pair: Matter and Nothingness         


Author: dlzc
Date: Feb 26, 2008 14:43

Dear Roy Jose Lorr:

On Feb 26, 1:30 pm, Roy Jose Lorr comcast.net> wrote:
> "Matter exists on the motion created by Nothingness
> drawing Matter back into the Nothingness from whence
> it came."
>
> Constructive comments in simple terms, pro and con
> will be appreciated.

It is not Science. It is verbal nonsense, with almost no cognates in
common with the Standard Model.

"Nothingness" is not helpful. Matter is diffusing, not being "drawn
in". Mass appears to derive from the System, not (detectably) the
Progenitor to the system. Entirely possible that space, time (the
"motion"), and mass all derive from the System.

Otherwise a perfectly meaningless use of the English language. Are
you considering running for the US Presidential nomination?

David A. Smith
no comments
Re: Contrasting Pair: Matter and Nothingness         


Author: xxein
Date: Feb 26, 2008 15:02

On Feb 26, 5:43 pm, dlzc cox.net> wrote:
> Dear Roy Jose Lorr:
>
> On Feb 26, 1:30 pm, Roy Jose Lorr comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> "Matter exists on the motion created by Nothingness
>> drawing Matter back into the Nothingness from whence
>> it came."
>
>> Constructive comments in simple terms, pro and con
>> will be appreciated.
>
> It is not Science.  It is verbal nonsense, with almost no cognates in
> common with the Standard Model.
>
> "Nothingness" is not helpful.  Matter is diffusing, not being "drawn
> in".  Mass appears to derive from the System, not (detectably) the
> Progenitor to the system.  Entirely possible that space, time (the
> "motion"), and mass all derive from the System.
> ...
Show full article (1.01Kb)
no comments
Re: Contrasting Pair: Matter and Nothingness         


Author: Androcles
Date: Feb 26, 2008 15:47

"xxein" comcast.net> wrote in message
news:c4369cd0-49ec-443a-95b7-e2280cd0e832@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 26, 5:43 pm, dlzc cox.net> wrote:
> Dear Roy Jose Lorr:
>
> On Feb 26, 1:30 pm, Roy Jose Lorr comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> "Matter exists on the motion created by Nothingness
>> drawing Matter back into the Nothingness from whence
>> it came."
>
>> Constructive comments in simple terms, pro and con
>> will be appreciated.
>
> It is not Science. It is verbal nonsense, with almost no cognates in
> common with the Standard Model.
>
> "Nothingness" is not helpful. Matter is diffusing, not being "drawn
> in". Mass appears to derive from the System, not (detectably) the
> Progenitor to the system. Entirely possible that space, time (the ...
Show full article (1.06Kb)
no comments
Re: Contrasting Pair: Matter and Nothingness         


Author: Roy Jose Lorr
Date: Feb 26, 2008 15:48

dlzc wrote:
> Dear Roy Jose Lorr:
>
> On Feb 26, 1:30 pm, Roy Jose Lorr comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>"Matter exists on the motion created by Nothingness
>>drawing Matter back into the Nothingness from whence
>>it came."
>>
>>Constructive comments in simple terms, pro and con
>>will be appreciated.
>
>
> It is not Science. It is verbal nonsense, with almost no cognates in
> common with the Standard Model.

To which 'Standard Model' do you refer?
>
> "Nothingness" is not helpful.
Show full article (1.30Kb)
no comments
Re: Contrasting Pair: Matter and Nothingness         


Author: Roy Jose Lorr
Date: Feb 26, 2008 15:58

Mary Hogan wrote:
>
> "Roy Jose Lorr" comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:_P2dnTRUorNC61nanZ2dnUVZ_q-jnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
>> "Matter exists on the motion created by Nothingness drawing Matter
>> back into the Nothingness from whence it came."
>>
>> Constructive comments in simple terms, pro and con will be appreciated.
>>
>
> I am not qualified for any debate about physics, and so I'm just
> thinking out loud.
>
> Time is missing from this.

How?
> Light and darkness are missing.

How?
Show full article (1.56Kb)
no comments
Re: Contrasting Pair: Matter and Nothingness         


Author: Mary Hogan
Date: Feb 26, 2008 16:21

"Roy Jose Lorr" comcast.net> wrote in message
news:yN6dnbrjJY4eOlnanZ2dnUVZ_uevnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Mary Hogan wrote:
>
>>
>> "Roy Jose Lorr" comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:_P2dnTRUorNC61nanZ2dnUVZ_q-jnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>>> "Matter exists on the motion created by Nothingness drawing Matter back
>>> into the Nothingness from whence it came."
>>>
>>> Constructive comments in simple terms, pro and con will be appreciated.
>>>
>>
>> I am not qualified for any debate about physics, and so I'm just thinking
>> out loud.
>>
>> Time is missing from this.
>
> How? ...
Show full article (3.42Kb)
no comments
Re: Contrasting Pair: Matter and Nothingness         


Author: Anthony G. Rubino
Date: Feb 26, 2008 16:12

Roy Jose Lorr wrote:

"Matter exists on the motion created by Nothingness drawing Matter back
into the Nothingness from whence it came."
Constructive comments in simple terms, pro and con will be appreciated.

My comments:

Matter and Space as Nonthingness leaves Spirit.

Will is a defining quality of Spirit that has the ability to Create from
a Nothingness that is indistinguishable from its Spiritual Being.

An act of Creation of Matter and Space would mark the Beginning of Time
as we know it.

The existence of Matter, Space, and Time, even with the addition of
Motion, would be insufficient to complete the Creation of the Universe
as we know it.

What's missing is the Will Power to supply the Energy to Direct the
Creation in accordance with Laws that are expressions of the Creative
Will and Source of Energy.

An Intelligent Design.
Show full article (0.98Kb)
no comments
Re: Contrasting Pair: Matter and Nothingness         


Author: Androcles
Date: Feb 26, 2008 16:35

"Mary Hogan" zoominternet.net> wrote in message
news:1204071182_4768@isp.n...
|
| "Roy Jose Lorr" comcast.net> wrote in message
| news:yN6dnbrjJY4eOlnanZ2dnUVZ_uevnZ2d@comcast.com...
| > Mary Hogan wrote:
| >
| >>
| >> "Roy Jose Lorr" comcast.net> wrote in message
| >> news:_P2dnTRUorNC61nanZ2dnUVZ_q-jnZ2d@comcast.com...
| >>
| >>> "Matter exists on the motion created by Nothingness drawing Matter
back
| >>> into the Nothingness from whence it came."
| >>>
| >>> Constructive comments in simple terms, pro and con will be
appreciated.
| >>>
| >>
| >> I am not qualified for any debate about physics, and so I'm just ...
Show full article (1.27Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9