>On Jul 8, 2:01Â am, Phil Odox
btopenworld.com> wrote:>>>On Jul 7, 8:18Â pm, Phil Odox
btopenworld.com> wrote:>>>> On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 18:17:05 +0100, "THE BORG"
here.com> wrote:>>
>>>>>You know full well how we hate humans eh?
>>
>>>> Oh yes, your hate for all humankind is well known.
>>
>>>>>So why messages on how we "love" human children?
>>
>>>> Good question. Why do you write messages pretending
>>>> to love children after writing messages saying you don't,
>>>> and that they aren't welcome anywhere?
>>
>>>> Â "Children are nasty whingeing brats - and no one likes
>>>> Â them. They are merely constantly recurring previous
>>>> Â adults. There is nothing new about them at all. You will
>>>> Â find in space they are not welcome."
>>>> Â The Borg 10 Dec 2007 Â
http://tinyurl.com/6auqz8 >>
>>>>>Do you not know what sarcasm is?
>>
>>>> Oh, so you were being sarcastic when writing about your
>>>> love of children. Truth is, you hate them, much like you
>>>> hate everyone. Is there any end to your puny hatred?
>>
>>>Hatred is like a running track. You never get anywhere, but eventually
>>>run out of steam.
>>
>> You think this deluded borg character is ever likely to run
>> out of steam?
>
>She doesnt hate.
You've only got to look at the top of this post to see
that she/he/it hates;
"You know full well how we hate humans eh?"
And I can produce dozens more admissions from the
archives showing she/he/it does.
>Just confused after a very heart breaking experience.
And that, even if true, is a valid reason to hate everyone
and threaten them with "punishment" if they refuse to
accept her/his/its position as a supreme being who must
be worshipped?
"You will learn to worship us, serve us, respect us and
obey us. The punishments will come later"
The Borg 29 June 2008
http://tinyurl.com/6oabkr
Argumentum ad misericordiam followed by argumentum
ad baculum is not a valid way to get a position accepted.
>Par for the course.
No, it is not.
