|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Michael GrayMichael Gray Date: Jan 26, 2008 21:10
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:56:33 -0500, Christopher A.Lee
optonline.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:18:24 +1030, Michael Gray
> newsguy.com> wrote:
>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:01:09 -0600, Free Lunch
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:32:55 -0500...
|
| Show full article (4.04Kb) |
|
| | 52 Comments |
|
|
Author: Christopher A.LeeChristopher A.Lee Date: Jan 26, 2008 22:48
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:40:22 +1030, Michael Gray
newsguy.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:56:33 -0500, Christopher A.Lee
> optonline.net> wrote:
>>>On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:18:24 +1030, Michael Gray
>> newsguy.com> wrote:
>>>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:01...
|
| Show full article (5.74Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Michael GrayMichael Gray Date: Jan 26, 2008 23:52
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 01:48:01 -0500, Christopher A.Lee
optonline.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:40:22 +1030, Michael Gray
> newsguy.com> wrote:
>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:56:33 -0500, Christopher A.Lee
>> optonline.net> wrote:
>>>>>On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:18...
|
| Show full article (6.05Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: dukeduke Date: Jan 27, 2008 05:13
On Jan 26, 11:10 pm, Michael Gray newsguy.com> wrote:
> Yes, I understand that you are approaching the issue from the point of
> view of a skeptical scholar, and that you (basically) agree with my
> premise.
> But when it boils down to the Sherlock Holmes analysis, the answer is transparently clear:
If there were a Yeshua teacher character in that period, he was so
utterly inconsequential or trivial as to be indistinguishable from any
peasant Jew of the period.
Until he walked out of his tomb.
> I say: present even a shred of evidence that such a person even
> existed, let alone held magical powers, and I will treat it fairly.
You get that daily, and still you deny without support.
|
| |
| 6 Comments |
|
|
Author: dukeduke Date: Jan 27, 2008 05:16
On Jan 27, 12:48 am, Christopher A.Lee optonline.net> wrote:
> They can't identify which of these itinerant preachers was the Jesus
> of the Gospels.
But only one died on the cross and then walked out of his tomb on the
3rd day. That's the one.
> But there are probably other roots. Paul doesn't mention a Logos. Or a human Jesus. Just a divine Christ.
That's the whole point - Jesus, son of God, and the 2nd person of the
Holy Trinity.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: dukeduke Date: Jan 27, 2008 05:17
On Jan 27, 1:52 am, Michael Gray newsguy.com> wrote:> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 01:48:01 -0500, Christopher A.Lee
>
>
>
>
>
> optonline.net> wrote:>>On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:40:22 +1030, Michael Gray
>> newsguy.com> wrote:>
>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:56:33 -0500, Christopher A.Lee
>>> optonline.net> wrote:>
>>>>On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:18:24 +1030, Michael Gray
>>>> newsguy.com> wrote:>
>>>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:01:09 -0600, Free Lunch
>>>>>wrote:
> ...
|
| Show full article (6.18Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: dukeduke Date: Jan 27, 2008 05:51
On Jan 27, 7:34 am, Richard Anacker <1...@taunus-biker.de> wrote:
> duke , 01.27.2008:
>> But only one died on the cross and then walked out of his tomb on the 3rd day.
> Now again - witnesses! No evidence. Nobody has seen him >walking .outa there. This is a good example how 'good xians' lie >straight in the face of others. Shame on you, hypocrite.
I'm not sure if I should laugh at you or cry out of your ignorance.
They didn't see him walk out, but they did walk with him for the next
40 days.
Is it possible you're that ignorant?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: dukeduke Date: Jan 27, 2008 05:52
On Jan 27, 7:30 am, Richard Anacker <1...@taunus-biker.de> wrote:
> duke , 01.27.2008:
>
>>> I say: present even a shred of evidence that such a person even
>>> existed, let alone held magical powers, and I will treat it fairly.
>
>> You get that daily, and still you deny without support.
>
> Because you daily repeat the same unproven crap? Evidence through
> pronouncement is no evidence at all.
Find me one, just one, witness for the American Revolution.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Hollywood LeeHollywood Lee Date: Jan 27, 2008 06:01
duke wrote:
> On Jan 27, 7:30 am, Richard Anacker <1...@taunus-biker.de> wrote:
>> duke , 01.27.2008:
>>
>>>> I say: present even a shred of evidence that such a person even
>>>> existed, let alone held magical powers, and I will treat it fairly.
>>> You get that daily, and still you deny without support.
>> Because you daily repeat the same unproven crap? Evidence through
>> pronouncement is no evidence at all.
>
> Find me one, just one, witness for the American Revolution.
LOL. And Tom Cruise thinks all of you are deluded suppressives. Mitt
would invite you to become a god of your own planets. And a thousand
other prophets have "evidence" of their gods' one trueness of the
quality you offer.
The only truth is Mango Pie - with ice cream for those with MP IV status.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Pastor DavePastor Dave Date: Jan 27, 2008 08:04
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 14:34:00 +0100, Richard Anacker
<116@taunus-biker.de> said the following:
>duke , 01.27.2008:
>
>> But only one died on the cross and then walked out of his tomb on the
>> 3rd day.
>
>Now again - witnesses! No evidence. Nobody has seen him walking outa
>there. This is a good example how 'good xians' lie straight in the
>face of others. Shame on you, hypocrite.
So the testimony of those who saw Him die
and then alive again, doesn't count and you
can't figure out that it means that He rose.
Actually, you can, you just don't care. Goodbye!
--
"If something in science suddenly becomes so sacrosanct
that you can't question it, then it ceases to be science",
he said. "And I really think that's what's become of
Darwinism." - Roger DeHart
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
