|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Mike PainterMike Painter Date: Jan 28, 2008 14:38
Michael Gray wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:44:13 -0600, Free Lunch
> wrote:
>>>
>>> True, that is a part of my case, but not all of it.
>>> The claims made for the biblical Jesus are historically impossible,
>>> as they set up two or more mutually contradictory claims.
>>
>> The fact that the claims are contradictory neither tell us that the
>> claims are unreliable,
>
> Eh?
> Did you phrase that incorrectly?
> It *does* tell us that the "claims" are contradictory!
Perhaps you should explain that if they contradict each other only one can
be true and both can be false.
If this was examined from a scientific viewpoint which tried to show the
book was litterally true, it would be falsified at this point.
|
| Show full article (1.05Kb) |
|
| | 43 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: SuzanneSuzanne Date: Jan 29, 2008 22:31
> Michael Gray wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:44:13 -0600, Free Lunch
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> True, that is a part of my case, but not all of it.
>>>> The claims made for the biblical Jesus are historically impossible,
>>>> as they set up two or more mutually contradictory claims.
>>>
>>> The fact that the claims are contradictory neither tell us that the
>>> claims are unreliable,
>>
>> Eh?
>> Did you phrase that incorrectly?
>> It *does* tell us that the "claims" are contradictory!
>
> Perhaps you should explain that if they contradict each other only one can
> be true and both can be false.
> If this was examined from a scientific viewpoint which tried to show the ...
|
| Show full article (1.08Kb) |
| 21 Comments |
|
|
Author: gudloosgudloos Date: Jan 30, 2008 04:50
On 30 Jan., 07:31, "Suzanne" flash.net> wrote:>> Michael Gray wrote:
>>> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:44:13 -0600, Free Lunch
>>> wrote:
>
>>>>> True, that is a part of my case, but not all of it.
>>>>> The claims made for the biblical Jesus are historically impossible,
>>>>> as they set up two or more mutually contradictory claims.
>
>>>> The fact that the claims are contradictory neither tell us that the
>>>> claims are unreliable,
>
>>> Eh?
>>> Did you phrase that incorrectly? ...
|
| Show full article (1.30Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: LibertariusLibertarius Date: Jan 30, 2008 20:34
Free Lunch wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:31:01 -0600, in alt.atheism
> "Suzanne" flash.net> wrote in
> nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>:
> >>>Michael Gray wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:44:13 -0600, Free Lunch
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>True, that is a part of my case, but not all of it.
>>>>>>The claims made for the biblical Jesus are historically impossible,
>>>>>>as they set up two or more mutually contradictory claims.
>>>>>
>>>>>The fact that the claims are contradictory neither tell us that the
>>>>>claims are unreliable,
>>>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.98Kb) |
| 925 Comments |
|
|
Author: SuzanneSuzanne Date: Feb 3, 2008 17:15
"Free Lunch" wrote in message
news:3e62q39o01rarme3dd004p49j5o3o9g3bt@4ax.com...> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:31:01 -0600, in alt.atheism
> "Suzanne" flash.net> wrote in
> nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>:>>> Michael Gray wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:44:13 -0600, Free Lunch
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> True, that is a part of my case, but not all of it.
>>>>>> The claims made for the biblical Jesus are historically impossible,
>>>>>> as they set up two or more mutually contradictory claims.
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact that the claims are contradictory neither tell us that the
>>>>> claims are unreliable,
>>>>
>>>> Eh? ...
|
| Show full article (1.62Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: SuzanneSuzanne Date: Feb 3, 2008 17:21
> Free Lunch wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:31:01 -0600, in alt.atheism "Suzanne"
>> flash.net> wrote in
>> nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>:
>>>>>>Michael Gray wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:44:13 -0600, Free Lunch
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>True, that is a part of my case, but not all of it.
>>>>>>>The claims made for the biblical Jesus are historically impossible,
>>>>>>>as they set up two or more mutually contradictory claims.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The fact that the claims are contradictory neither tell us that the ...
|
| Show full article (2.21Kb) |
| 28 Comments |
|
|
Author: Free LunchFree Lunch Date: Feb 3, 2008 17:22
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:21:01 -0600, in alt.atheism
"Suzanne" flash.net> wrote in
nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>:>
>"Libertarius" wrote in message
>news:47a1445e$0$26043$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...>> Free Lunch wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:31:01 -0600, in alt.atheism "Suzanne"
>>> flash.net> wrote in
>>> nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>:
>>>>>>>>Michael Gray wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:44:13 -0600, Free Lunch
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>True, that is a part of my case, but not all of it. ...
|
| Show full article (2.46Kb) |
| 26 Comments |
|
|
Author: Free LunchFree Lunch Date: Feb 3, 2008 17:22
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:15:18 -0600, in alt.atheism
"Suzanne" flash.net> wrote in
nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>:>
>"Free Lunch" wrote in message
>news:3e62q39o01rarme3dd004p49j5o3o9g3bt@4ax.com...>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:31:01 -0600, in alt.atheism
>> "Suzanne" flash.net> wrote in
>> nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>:>>>> Michael Gray wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:44:13 -0600, Free Lunch
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> True, that is a part of my case, but not all of it.
>>>>>>> The claims made for the biblical Jesus are historically impossible,
>>>>>>> as they set up two or more mutually contradictory claims.
>>>>>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Mike PainterMike Painter Date: Feb 3, 2008 19:29
Suzanne wrote:
> You are assuming that I am assuming. But I am not assuming.
> The Holy Spirit confirms to me that the Bible is God's word,
> and that it is true.
>>
> Suzanne
Martin Luther says you are wrong and are damned unless you agree with him.
"I do not admit that my doctrine can be judged by anyone, even the angels.
He who does not receive my doctrine cannot be saved"
-- Martin Luther Werke (Erlangen),XXIX , 217-33, on Maritian, 15.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
